Why do we aim for Single Mode waveguides?

Click For Summary
Single mode (SM) waveguides are preferred in sensing applications due to their simplicity, as they allow for a single optical path, minimizing interference from multiple modes. Using multimode fibers can lead to complications from varying optical path lengths, which can confuse measurements. For short waveguides, the advantages of SM operation become clearer when considering input and output connections with SM fibers, as it helps maintain power efficiency. Additionally, in setups involving grating couplers, SM operation is crucial to prevent light dispersion. Overall, the choice of single mode waveguides enhances performance and reliability in sensing applications.
Fixar Frazze
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I trying to formulate a new project based on waveguides (~1 cm long) for sensing with the evanescent field. In all papers I've seen on similar topics they all aim for single mode (SM) waveguides, but I never understood the reason.

Is there a quick answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It totally depends on the application. If you use multimode fiber, then the different modes will have different optical path lengths through the fiber, and might cause some confusion with interference and stuff. Single mode is simple, just one optical path (or perhaps two polarizations)
 
Yes, for fibers I can understand that the dispersion is something you want to manage over long distances, but for short waveguides I just don't see much of a point in making it SM. Maybe if you have a SM fiber as input and output with a waveguide in-between it is probably beneficial to have a SM waveguide in order to not loose to much power into other modes that don't fit into the output SMF. Ah and also if you have a grating coupler I fusee you want SM-operation in order to not spread the light in all directions...
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
14K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K