Undergrad Why does SU(2) have 3 parameters/generators like the SO(3)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TimeRip496
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Su(2)
Click For Summary
SU(2) has three parameters because the unitary condition and the special condition (determinant equals one) reduce the four parameters derived from its matrix representation. Specifically, the determinant condition restricts the parameters to a three-dimensional manifold, analogous to the rotation group SO(3). The relationship between SU(2) and SO(3) can be understood through their respective geometric interpretations, where SU(2) can be viewed as rotations in a four-dimensional space with an imaginary axis. The Lie algebra of SU(2) also confirms this dimensionality, as it is spanned by the Pauli matrices. Ultimately, the structure of SU(2) mirrors that of SO(3) in terms of degrees of freedom, despite the differences in their mathematical representations.
TimeRip496
Messages
249
Reaction score
5
From "Symmetry and the Standard Model: Mathematics and Particle Physics by Matthew Robinson", it states that 'SU(2) matrix has one of the real parameters fixed,leaving three real parameters'.

I don't really get this part and hope someone can clear my doubt.
_____________________________________________________

To ensure that the matrix is unitary, c=-b* & d=a* while a=a and b=b. To ensure that it is special, ad-bc=1

Together, $$ ad-bc=a.a^*-b.(-b^*)=|a|^2 + |b|^2 = 1 $$

$$a=Re(a)+i Im(a)$$ & $$b=Re(b)+i Im(b)$$ ← From here I got 4 parameters.

$$ |a|^2 + |b|^2 = (Re(a))^2 +(Im(a))^2 + (Re(b))^2 +(Im(b))^2 = 1 $$← I still see 4 parameters thus I am still not sure how the unit determinant fix one of the parameter.

___________________________________________________________________________________
Can I think of it another way as in just like SO(3) rotation, in SU(2) we also have a 3D space except instead of z axis, we have the i(imaginary) axis. So is no different from rotation in 3D space other than just changing the one of the axis to i-axis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can write ##a=\pm \sqrt{1-b^2-c^2-d^2}## which leaves you with three free variables ##b,c,d##.

Or you can pass over to its Lie algebra ##\mathfrak{su}(2)##, which is of the same dimension and has the ##i-##multiples of the Pauli-matrices as real basis.

Or you can identify an element ##\begin{bmatrix}x_1\mathbf{1}+x_2\mathbf{i} & -x_3\mathbf{1}+x_4\mathbf{i} \\x_3\mathbf{1}+x_4\mathbf{i} & x_1\mathbf{1}-x_2\mathbf{i} \end{bmatrix}## of ##SU(2)## with a point ##x_1\mathbf{1}+x_2\mathbf{i}+x_3\mathbf{j}+x_4\mathbf{k}## in ##\mathbb{R}^4##. Now the determinant condition reduces these point to the sphere ##\mathbb{S}^3##, which is a three-dimensional manifold.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Demystifier and Jilang
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K