Why does summation start at k=0 in this series?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter StevenJacobs990
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules Summation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
StevenJacobs990
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
n
∑ 3
k=0

How does this make sense when k=0?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The sum is ##3+3+...=3(n+1)##
 
Gene Naden said:
The sum is ##3+3+...=3(n+1)##
Oh okay. The lower bound is the index origin and doesn't matter if it is negative?
n
∑ 3
k=-1
3+3+...=3(n+2)
 
To summarise,
$$
\sum_{k=a}^{b} c = c (b-a+1)
$$
for constant ##c##.
 
DrClaude said:
To summarise,
$$
\sum_{k=a}^{b} c = c (b-a+1)
$$
for constant ##c##.
i.e. one is counting fence posts, not sections of wire.