Why don't garbage trucks grind garbage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter parsec
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the idea of garbage trucks grinding waste instead of merely compacting it. Proponents argue that grinding could increase the volume of waste transported, improve landfill logistics by creating a slurry that could be pumped directly into landfills, and potentially enhance waste decay rates. However, significant concerns are raised regarding the feasibility and safety of such an approach. The mechanical challenges of maintaining grinders that can handle various waste types without jamming, as well as the increased fuel consumption associated with grinding, are highlighted as major drawbacks. Additionally, the potential for environmental contamination from hazardous materials and the loss of recyclables due to mixing waste are critical issues. The conversation also touches on the operational noise of garbage trucks and the implications of grinding on waste management processes at transfer stations. Overall, while the idea presents some theoretical benefits, practical and safety concerns dominate the discussion.
parsec
Messages
112
Reaction score
1
Strange question, i know. I didn't really know where to put it.

Why don't garbage trucks grind their garbage instead of simply compacting it? There's plenty of shaft power available in the truck to reduce the garbage into a reasonably fine consistency.

This would allow the trucks to carry much more garbage on a single route and would also facilitate easier handling and landfill logistics. The garbage could be mixed with water to form a slurry and simply pumped into landfill instead of having to be laboriously moved using bobcat-like machinery.

I imagine the landfill would be much more efficiently utilised in this scenario, as there would be hardly any air and wasted space within the garbage slurry. The garbage may also decay more quickly when thoroughly mixed as a thick slurry.

There may also be scope for sorting useful materials from the ground garbage (pre slurry) using some mass dependent hydrodynamic or aerodynamic process and appropriate filter membranes. (Perhaps the garbage could be blown around a bend with high velocity air, with different catchment receptacles for flung particles of varying mass)

Just a random thought.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One problem i could see is an increase in the amount of seepage into the water supply.
 
When your garbage goes to a landfill, it goes through a special machine that separates out food wastes from plastics and metals. Some of the materials are then redirecting into the recycling streams.

If you ground it all up together in the truck, you'd no longer be able to reclaim any of it at all.

- Warren
 
chroot said:
When your garbage goes to a landfill, it goes through a special machine that separates out food wastes from plastics and metals. Some of the materials are then redirecting into the recycling streams.

Really? I doubt that is common.

It's kind of an engineering question, right? A fairly average piece of garbage is something like, perhaps, a cardboard milk carton. There's likely to be a lot of empty space inside that kind of thing, and it won't take so much effort to crumple it down. If you first ground it up, then compacted it down, you still wouldn't get the milk carton much smaller still, but you would need far more energy for tearing it apart. Diminishing returns. Also, the mechanics of a compactor can be hardy, regardless of what type of garbage you have. But imagine the difficulty of maintaining a grinder, which doesn't jam or blunt on paper, doesn't get gummed up by banana peel and plastic bags, but can still grind apart glass and metal efficiently? Wouldn't it be made of sharp edges, that quickly wear down and need servicing? I'd say those trucks don't grind for the same reason they don't atomise..
 
You don't necessarily need sharp edges if you have an abundance of power.

It turns out the idea was toyed with in Germany at some stage. It was unpopular due to the increased fuel consumption of the trucks. I guess the extra fuel that is used is more expensive than the landfill savings and the cost of a bobcat jockey.
 
If you live in an area that has a "transfer station" as opposed to a "landfill" then the separation process that Chroot mentions is going on right there.

Other than that, plus the fuel consuption, those trucks already make the goddamdest noise! You want them grinding the garbage at 6 in the morning too?
 
My garbage pickup happens late in the afternoon :)
 
I would think that there would be a limit to the tonnage a truck would carry.
 
Chi Meson said:
If you live in an area that has a "transfer station" as opposed to a "landfill" then the separation process that Chroot mentions is going on right there.

you really see the phrase "one man's trash is another man's treasure" in full effect at transfer stations. Very popular in Alaska. I have friends who's assets are practically made up of transfer station scores.
 
  • #10
Not to mention some people throw out hazardous materials, and grinding a hazmat could contaminate the surrounding environment, not to mention medical waste garbage, explosive, flammable liquids, reactive chemicals with other garbage (ammonia + bleach anyone?), sometimes corpses end up in the garbage truck and it becomes a crime scene which you won't want to destroy
 
  • #11
^

Each one of those is reason enough.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
28K