Why Don't We Write the Coefficient m(x) in Differential Equations?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter matematikuvol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coefficients Derivative
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the representation of coefficients in differential equations, specifically questioning why equations are typically written without a coefficient for the second derivative term, denoted as m(x). Participants explore the implications of including such a coefficient and the conditions under which it may or may not be appropriate.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that differential equations are often written in the form y''(x) + a(x)y'(x) + b(x) = f(x) without a coefficient for y''(x), suggesting this is a standard practice.
  • Others argue that including a coefficient m(x) for y''(x) is possible, but typically, the first step in solving such equations is to divide by the coefficient of y''(x).
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of m(x) being zero for some x, with one participant suggesting that the behavior of the solution set changes drastically at those points.
  • Another participant points out that if m(x) is zero at some x, it creates a singular point in the equation, which can be classified as either a regular or irregular singular point.
  • There is a suggestion that regular singular points can be handled similarly to certain types of equations encountered in differential equations courses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and implications of including a coefficient m(x) in differential equations. While some agree that it is common to omit it, others contend that it can be included and discuss the consequences of doing so, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the concept of singular points and the classification of these points, but there is no consensus on the best approach to handle equations with m(x) included or the implications of m(x) being zero.

matematikuvol
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
Why we always write equation in form
[tex]y''(x)+a(x)y'(x)+b(x)=f(x)[/tex]

Why we never write:
[tex]m(x)y''(x)+a(x)y'(x)+b(x)=f(x)[/tex]
Why we never write coefficient ##m(x)## for example?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
matematikuvol said:
Why we always write equation in form
[tex]y''(x)+a(x)y'(x)+b(x)=f(x)[/tex]

Why we never write:
[tex]m(x)y''(x)+a(x)y'(x)+b(x)=f(x)[/tex]
Why we never write coefficient ##m(x)## for example?

Because usually the first thing to do is divide by the coefficient of [itex]y''[/itex].
 
But what if for some ##x##, ##m(x)=0##.
 
matematikuvol said:
But what if for some ##x##, ##m(x)=0##.

My guess, the behavior of the solution set changes drastically wherever m(x)=0.
 
I'm not sure how to answer your question, "Why we never write coefficient m(x) for example?" because we often do! I suspect you simply have not yet gone far enough in differential equations to see such equations.

Of course, if m(x) is never 0, we can simplify by dividing by it. If m(x)= 0 for some x, that x becomes a "singular point" for the equation- either a "regular singular point" or an "irregular singular point". Regular singular points can be handled in a similar way to "Euler type" or "equi-potential equations, [itex]ax^2y''+ bxy'+ cy= f(x)[/itex] where each coefficient has x to the same degree as the order of the derivative. Such equations are typically approach late in a first semester differential equations class.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K