Chemistry Why Is Methylation of Glucose Considered Nucleophilic Substitution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter duchuy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Glucose Mechanism
AI Thread Summary
Methylation of glucose is considered nucleophilic substitution because the reaction primarily involves the nucleophilic attack of the oxygen atoms in glucose on the electrophilic carbon of methyl iodide (CH3I). While CH3 can be viewed as electrophilic due to the partial positive charge on the carbon, the focus in organic chemistry is on the substrate where the substitution occurs, which is the carbon in CH3I. The process replaces a hydrogen atom in glucose with a methyl group, emphasizing the nucleophilic nature of the glucose oxygen. Understanding the roles of nucleophiles and electrophiles is crucial, as both are necessary for these reactions. Ultimately, the classification hinges on the site of substitution, which in this case is the carbon of CH3I.
duchuy
Messages
79
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Nucleophilic or electrophilic substitution
Relevant Equations
x
Hi,
I don't understand why this correction would be a nucleophile substitution?
From what understand : The O atoms in the cyclic glucose acts as nucleophiles. ICH3 is also a nucleophile due to the presence of iodine's "non bonding electron pairs" (sorry I don't know the right term for this), and since I is a halogen, CH3 bares partial positive charge.
Ch3 being electrophilic, comes and replace H. So why isn't it a electrophile substitution?
Can you please explain to me what went wrong in my thought process?
And do you have a way that which I can determine what kind of substitution it is everytime because I don't really know which molecule would be the one that that has a substituted group? Like from this case, is H substituted by CH3 or I substituted by glucose?
Thank you so much for your help!
1618561716310.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a sense it's all the same, because you can't have nucleophiles without electrophiles, just as you can't have acid without base, or oxidation without reduction. But in organic chemistry, we think of the reaction occurring at the carbon substrate. Thus, while the above reaction could be seen as an electrophilic substitution of H by methyl at the O of glucose, it would be normal to think of it as a nucleophilic substitution at the C of CH3I.
 
thank you sir!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top