Why is stamping of plans illegal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigislander72
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The stamping of plans is illegal when the licensed Professional Engineer (PE) did not supervise the work, as it undermines accountability and safety standards in the construction industry. The PE's authority to make changes does not extend to work performed by unlicensed individuals, as this can lead to non-compliance with applicable codes. The phrase "under my supervision" in the PE disclaimer emphasizes the necessity for direct oversight to ensure quality and adherence to regulations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Professional Engineer (PE) licensing requirements
  • Knowledge of construction industry regulations and codes
  • Familiarity with the concept of professional liability in engineering
  • Awareness of the role of supervision in engineering practices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the legal implications of PE supervision in engineering projects
  • Learn about the responsibilities and liabilities of licensed Professional Engineers
  • Explore case studies on violations of stamping regulations in construction
  • Investigate best practices for ensuring compliance with engineering codes
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, construction project managers, and regulatory compliance officers seeking to understand the legal framework surrounding the stamping of plans and the importance of supervision in engineering practices.

bigislander72
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Why is "stamping" of plans illegal?

I don't understand this. If plans are reviewed and approved by a licensed PE, what's the problem if they were not done "in house"? If the PE has the authority to make changes as neccesary, why not?

I ask this because much of the design work in my field(construction industry) could be performed by someone not licensed. If the stamped plans pass all applicable codes what is the problem?

I guess my question is what defines "under my supervision" in the PE disclaimer.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org


The reason for that is that the code authority assumes that if a PE is involved in the design process, they will be more inclined to review it or understand it better.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
914
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K