MHB Why is the integration result not -xe^-x - e^-x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cadbury
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Cadbury
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
View attachment 3778

So v' is the one to be integrated and v is the answer,
why is it not -xe^-x - e^-x ? :confused:

Thank you very much!
 

Attachments

  • a.png
    a.png
    970 bytes · Views: 95
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Cadbury. What is the result of $$\int x e^{-x} \, dx?$$
 
Fantini said:
Hello Cadbury. What is the result of $$\int x e^{-x} \, dx?$$

Oh, I get it now haha, first I have to use integration by parts where u= x, dv= e^ -x then uv - integral(vdu) then after

-xe^-x +e^-x - e^-x = -xe^-x hehe
 
It's even easier if you write the first DE as $\displaystyle \begin{align*} y' = \left( x - 1 \right) \, \mathrm{e}^{-x} \end{align*}$, you can still apply integration by parts and this time you don't have to do two separate integrals...
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top