- #1
EDerkatch
- 14
- 0
Could someone please explain to me why uds->uud+danti-up is an allowed reaction even though individual quark number conservations are violated?
Why is uds->uud+danti-up an allowed hardron reaction?
- Context: Graduate
- Thread starter EDerkatch
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Reactions
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the reaction uds → uud + danti-up, specifically questioning why this reaction is permitted despite apparent violations of individual quark number conservation. The focus is on the underlying interactions, particularly the weak interaction, and the conservation laws involved.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant asks for clarification on why the reaction is allowed despite violations of individual quark number conservation.
- Another participant asserts that the reaction is a weak interaction, where strangeness does not need to be conserved.
- A third participant reiterates that it is a weak interaction and emphasizes that flavor conservation is not applicable in this context.
- There are corrections regarding the spelling of "hadron," with participants noting the error.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree that the reaction is a weak interaction and that flavor conservation does not apply, but there is no consensus on the implications of quark number conservation violations.
Contextual Notes
Some assumptions about conservation laws and their applicability in weak interactions are not fully explored, leaving certain aspects unresolved.
Similar threads
- · Replies 4 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 7 ·
- · Replies 6 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 13 ·
- · Replies 4 ·