Work associated with polarization and magnetization

dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
Hi, this is not an exercise. In some lecture notes the authors states that from elementary EM I should familiar with the fact that the work associated with polarization and magnetization of a material is given by ##\delta W = E dP## and ##\delta W = BdM##. I have to admit that I am super rusty about EM so I was wondering if my reasoning to get here is correct.

- polarization: from Lorentz force without B field and identifying with ## d \mathbf l## the displacement from the "equilibrium position" (P = 0) of the bound charges, I get ## \mathbf F \cdot d \mathbf l = (q_{bound} + q_{ext}) \mathbf E \cdot d \mathbf l ##. Since I'm considering a neutral material ##q_{ext} = 0##, I can write ## \delta W = \mathbf E \cdot ( q_{bound} d \mathbf l )##. Here I naively identify ##q_{bound} d \mathbf l = d \mathbf P## and conclude ## \delta W = \mathbf E \cdot d \mathbf P##

- magnetization: I recall that for a magnetic dipole ## \mathbf m##, ## U = - \mathbf m \cdot \mathbf B##. Since the filed is supposed to be constant I just take the differential and it follows immediately that ## \delta W = \mathbf B \cdot d \mathbf m##
 
on Phys.org
Notice this then leads to the respective energy density E⋅D/2 and B⋅H/2 as it must. Jackson does this all rather well I think.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dRic2
Yes, didn't have a copy available. I'm going to check tomorrow. Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K