Writing determinant expansion as a summation

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lo2
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
10 replies · 4K views
lo2
Can this be written.

[tex] \[<br /> \det{\textbf{A}}=a_{11}a'_{11}+a_{12}a'_{12}+\ldots+a_{1n}a'{1n}<br /> \]<br /> [/tex]

As. (Where I just use p instead of n for obvious reasons)

[tex] \[<br /> \sum^{n}_{p=1}{a_{1p}a'_{1p}}<br /> \][/tex]

Since.

[tex] \[<br /> a'_{ij}=(-1)^{i+j}(\det{\textbf{A}_{ij}})<br /> \][/tex]

And yes we are talking determinants.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want help then write in a clear manner that people can understand, preferably in complete sentences - if people have to work hard at understanding what the question is they will tend not to bother working out what you intend.

What is a'_{rs}? What are you trying to prove?

I suspect that that doesn't matter. If all you're asking is does that summation expand to give the long hand version, then the answer is 'yes'. Just write down what the summation means.

Det has nothing to do with it as far as I can tell. But because you made a big point of saying it was abuot Det I have no idea if I've answered the question you intended to ask.
 
lo2 said:
[tex]a_{11}a'_{11}+a_{12}a'_{12}+\ldots+a_{1n}a'_{1n} = \sum^{n}_{p=1}{a_{1p}a'_{1p}}[/tex]

yes, these are equal.

Note, I cleaned up your latex. There is no need to include a \[ inside tex tags - I don't think it does anything.
 
You can delete it yourself.

If you think you were clear, can I ask what you think A_{ij} is? 'Cos we don't have a clue. And the 'since' is completely misleading. As is the sentence structure ('As.' is not a sentence, and is confusingly, given the post, like a plural form of A).
 
It's too late now, but next time click on 'edit' and there is an option to delete. The edit option vanishes after some amount of time.