Solving Electric Field Strength at Aircraft in Cloud: 1.03357e8 + 2.64009e9

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spectre32
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airplane Charging
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field strength at an aircraft flying through a cloud, with specific heights and temperatures provided for the top and bottom of the cloud. The problem involves applying Coulomb's law to determine the electric field contributions from both the top and bottom of the cloud.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Coulomb's law, noting the need to square the distance in the calculations. There are also questions regarding the correct placement of parentheses in the mathematical expressions used.

Discussion Status

Some participants have pointed out potential errors in the original poster's calculations, specifically regarding the squaring of distances and the correct use of parentheses. There is an ongoing exploration of these mathematical details without a clear consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses confusion after receiving feedback that their submitted answer was incorrect, indicating a need for clarification on the calculations involved.

Spectre32
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
AN airplane is flying through a cloud. The airplane is at 2100M and the top height of the cloud is 4100M @ 23 C. The bottem of the cloud is 500m @-47 C. What is the strength of the electric field E at the aircraft.

Now I broke it up into to parts, for the top of the cloud and the bottem.

Top of the cloud:

Using coulumbs law: 8.98755 x 10^9* 23/ 4100-2100) = 1.03357e8

Bottem of the cloud:

8.98775 x 10^9 * 47/ 2100-500 = 2.64009e9

I added both of those up and i submited my answer and it said it was wrong. Can anyone aid me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The distance should be squared.

Also, make sure you put your parentheses in the right place. I assume that you are actually typing the numbers into your calculator correctly, but just be careful.

8.98775 * 10^9 * 47 / 2100 - 500

is not the same as

(8.98775 * 10^9 * 47) / (2100 - 500)

- Warren
 
Originally posted by Spectre32

I added both of those up and i submited my answer and it said it was wrong. Can anyone aid me?
Assuming that the charged clouds can be treated as point sources of the electric field: use [itex]E=\frac{kq}{r^2}[/itex]. (You forgot to square your distances.)
 
crap... wow I'm so retarded thanks a lot doc
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
19K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K