QM problem, operators and tensors math

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AHolico
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators Qm Tensors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical properties of a projection operator defined as \(\mathbf{P} \equiv \frac{(\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{r})^2}{r^2}\) for a system of two spin-\(\frac{1}{2}\) particles. Participants analyze the conditions under which \(\mathbf{P}\) qualifies as a projection operator, specifically verifying the properties \(P^2 = P\) and \(P^+ = P\). The calculations reveal that the expression does not satisfy these properties, indicating that \(\mathbf{P}\) is not a valid projection operator. Additionally, the tensor operator \(S_{1,2} = 2(3P - \mathbf{S}^2)\) is discussed, with eigenvalues identified as 0, 2, and -4.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically spin operators.
  • Familiarity with matrix operations and tensor algebra.
  • Knowledge of projection operators in linear algebra.
  • Proficiency in complex number calculations and vector mathematics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of projection operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of spin operators in quantum systems.
  • Explore tensor operators and their applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the implications of eigenvalues in quantum state analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, mathematicians specializing in linear algebra, and students studying quantum mechanics who require a deeper understanding of spin systems and projection operators.

AHolico
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Let [tex]\mathbf{S} =[/tex][tex]\mbox{$\frac {1}{2}$}[/tex][tex](\sigma_1 + \sigma_2)[/tex] be the total spin of a system of two spin-(1/2) particles.

a) Show that [tex]\mathbf{P} \equiv (\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{r})^2 / {r^2}[/tex] is a projection operator

b) Show that tensor operator [tex]S_1_2[/tex][tex]= 2(3P - \mathbf{S}^2)[/tex] satisfies [tex]S_1_2[/tex][tex]^2 = 4\mathbf{S}^2 - 2[/tex][tex]S_1_2[/tex]

c) Show that the eigenvalues of [tex]S_1_2[/tex] are 0, 2 and -4

--------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm stuck at the first part, and have no idea on how to proceed. I know that if [tex]P[/tex] is a projection operator, then [tex]P^2 = P[/tex] and [tex]P^+ = P[/tex]. So, the first thing I do is expand P to check these properties. First thing I did is getting that [tex]r^2[/tex] inside of the dot product, leaving me with [tex]\mathbf{P} \equiv (\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n})^2[/tex], where n is an unitary vector.

[tex]\mathbf{S} = \frac{1}{2} (\sigma_1 + \sigma_2) = \frac{1}{2}\left[ \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & 1\\1 & 0\end{array}\right) + \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & -i\\i & 0\end{array}\right)\right] = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & 1-i\\1+i & 0\end{array}\right)[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{n} = \left(\begin{array}{c} cos \theta \\ sin \theta \end{array}\right)[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n} = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & 1-i\\1+i & 0\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} cos \theta \\ sin \theta \end{array}\right) = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c} sin \theta - i sin \theta\\ cos \theta + i cos \theta \end{array}\right)[/tex]

Now, to square it... should I (a) just multiply that vector by itself, or (b) multiply it complex conjungate and the vector?

a)[tex]\frac {1}{4}\left(sin \theta - i sin \theta , cos \theta + i cos \theta \right) \left( \begin{array}{c} sin \theta - i sin \theta\\ cos \theta + i cos \theta \end{array}\right) = \frac{i}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c} -sin \theta \\ cos \theta \end{array}\right)[/tex]

I thiunk this is not a proyection operator because [tex]P^+ = P[/tex].

b)[tex]\frac {1}{4}\left(sin \theta + i sin \theta , cos \theta - i cos \theta \right) \left( \begin{array}{c} sin \theta - i sin \theta\\ cos \theta + i cos \theta \end{array}\right) = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c} sin^2 \theta \\ cos^2 \theta \end{array}\right)[/tex]

But clearly this is not a proyection operator because [tex]P^2 = P[/tex]

In some book I found that [tex]\vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n} = \sigma_1 sin \theta cos \phi + \sigma_2 sin \theta sin \phi + \sigma_3 cos \theta[/tex]
If I follow this approach then
[tex]\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n} = \frac {1}{2} \sigma_1 cos \theta + \frac {1}{2} \sigma_2 sin \theta[/tex]
[tex](\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n})^2 = \frac {1}{4} \sigma_1^2 cos^2 \theta + \frac {1}{4} \sigma_2^2 sin^2 \theta + \frac {1}{4} \sigma_1 \sigma_2 sin \theta cos \theta + \frac {1}{4} \sigma_2 \sigma_1 sin \theta cos \theta[/tex]
[tex](\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n})^2 = \frac {1}{4} \mathbb{I}[/tex]

The identity matrix is a projection operator, but that constant in front of it is giving me problems. What I'm doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by AHolico
[tex]\mathbf{S} = \frac{1}{2} (\sigma_1 + \sigma_2) = \frac{1}{2}\left[ \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & 1\\1 & 0\end{array}\right) + \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & -i\\i & 0\end{array}\right)\right] = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & 1-i\\1+i & 0\end{array}\right)[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{n} = \left(\begin{array}{c} cos \theta \\ sin \theta \end{array}\right)[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n} = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & 1-i\\1+i & 0\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} cos \theta \\ sin \theta \end{array}\right) = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c} sin \theta - i sin \theta\\ cos \theta + i cos \theta \end{array}\right)[/tex]

Now, to square it... should I (a) just multiply that vector by itself, or (b) multiply it complex conjungate and the vector?

Hold on. It appears that you are not writing P as a vector. If you are working in 2D (are you allowed to assume that?), then you should write P as:

P=(1/2)(Pxi+Pyj)
P=(1/2)[(σ1x+σ2x)i+(σ1y+σ2y)j]

But what you have done here is add the σx and σy without paying attention to the fact that they are components of a vector.

Edit to add: You also seem to be ignoring the fact that you have a 2-particle system. I think you are getting the labels "1" and "2" mixed up with the components of σ, when in fact they are the labels for the spin operators of particles 1 and 2, respectively.
 
Last edited:


Any help will be appreciated.

There are a few mistakes in your calculations. First, the definition of \mathbf{P} should be (\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{r})^2 / r^2, not (\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n})^2 as you have written. This is because we want \mathbf{P} to be a function of the position vector \mathbf{r}, not just a unit vector \mathbf{n}.

Next, your calculation for \mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n} is incorrect. Remember that \mathbf{S} is a matrix, so we can't just multiply it by a vector like \mathbf{n}. Instead, we need to use the dot product formula \mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{B} = A_x B_x + A_y B_y + A_z B_z. In this case, we have \mathbf{S} = \frac{1}{2}(\sigma_1 + \sigma_2) and \mathbf{n} = (sin \theta cos \phi, sin \theta sin \phi, cos \theta). Plugging these into the dot product formula gives

\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n} = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & 1-i\\1+i & 0\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} sin \theta cos \phi\\ sin \theta sin \phi \end{array}\right) = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c} sin \theta sin \phi - i sin \theta cos \phi\\ sin \theta cos \phi + i sin \theta sin \phi \end{array}\right)

Squaring this vector gives

(\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n})^2 = \frac{1}{4}\left(sin^2 \theta sin^2 \phi + sin^2 \theta cos^2 \phi - 2sin \theta cos \theta sin \phi cos \phi \right) = \frac{1}{4}sin^2 \theta

This is not a projection operator because it is not equal to its own square.

To find the correct projection operator, we need
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K