Calculating Initial Velocity in a Simple Car Braking Problem

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Xeonicus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Braking Car
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the initial velocity of a car that has locked its wheels while braking, based on given parameters such as braking distance, final velocity, mass of the vehicle, and coefficient of friction. The conversation explores the dynamics of braking, the forces involved, and the appropriate use of friction coefficients in the calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a method for calculating initial velocity using a braking distance of 20 feet, a final velocity of 50 m/s, and a coefficient of friction of 0.6, but questions the inclusion of a typical deceleration rate of -8.5 m/s² in their calculations.
  • Another participant distinguishes between the coefficients of sliding friction (when wheels are locked) and static friction (when braking without skidding), suggesting that the latter should be used for maximum braking efficiency.
  • A participant challenges the assumption that the only force causing deceleration is the friction from sliding tires, questioning the relevance of the typical deceleration value used in the initial calculations.
  • Further clarification is sought regarding the role of rolling friction, with one participant asserting that rolling friction does not contribute when wheels are rolling, while another suggests that static friction is more relevant during braking.
  • A participant acknowledges a mistake in their terminology regarding rolling friction and clarifies that only static or sliding friction should be considered in the context of the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the forces at play during braking, particularly regarding the relevance of rolling versus static friction. There is no consensus on the correct approach to calculating initial velocity, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of distinguishing between different types of friction and their effects on braking dynamics. The discussion reveals uncertainties about the appropriate values to use for deceleration and the implications of different friction coefficients.

Xeonicus
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The problem is simple, its a matter of finding a car's initial velocity after locking up the wheels while braking. Here is what I know:

The braking distance (skid marks) go for 20 feet, the final velocity is 50m/s, the mass of the vehicle is 2000kg, and the coefficient of friction of the tire and asphalt is 0.6. What is the initial velocity?

Here is how I did it first:
1) force friction = 0.6 * 2000 * 9.8 = 11760N
2) m * a = 2000 * a = -force friction + ( 2000 * -8.5 )
2000 * a = -11760 - 17000
a = 14.38 m/s^2
3) Then I go on to solve for the intial velocity after getting the deceleration.

In step 2, I used -8.5 for a typical deceleration rate of a vehicle when it slams on the brakes. What I'm told though, is that I don't need to add this force for braking and I only need to put in the friction force (0.6 * normal). So I'd just have "m * a = -force friction" and the deceleration would be -5.88 m/s^2. It seems to me though, that a vehicle would deceleration more quickly if the brakes were applied, more so than just slowed down by the force of rolling friction the road applies.

So can anyone clear this up for me? Something to do with internal/external forces?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.) Lock up wheels with brakes = coefficient of sliding friction

2.) Brake as hard as possible without skidding = coefficient of static friction

In an emergency-if you like your car, use #2.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"In step 2, I used -8.5 for a typical deceleration rate of a vehicle when it slams on the brakes. What I'm told though, is that I don't need to add this force for braking and I only need to put in the friction force (0.6 * normal). "

I was wondering where that "8.5" came from! The only force causing the car to decelerate IS the friction of the tires sliding on the road.

As long as the wheels are rolling, the road does not supply ANY "rolling friction".
 
HallsofIvy said: "As long as the wheels are rolling, the road does not supply ANY "rolling friction"."

If it doesn't when the wheels are rolling, then when does it?

Don't you really mean that since rolling friction is much less than static friction, that during breaking, if the wheels are rolling, the frictional force applied by the road to the car is nearly equal to the static friction?
 
jdavel said:
HallsofIvy said: "As long as the wheels are rolling, the road does not supply ANY "rolling friction"."

If it doesn't when the wheels are rolling, then when does it?

Don't you really mean that since rolling friction is much less than static friction, that during breaking, if the wheels are rolling, the frictional force applied by the road to the car is nearly equal to the static friction?

Sorry, this is my fault, my original post said "rolling friction". I should not have
mentioned rolling friction at all. The rolling friction is not a factor in this problem, only the static friction or the sliding friction. I edited it so as not to cause confusion for anyone else. I must have been on crack when I wrote that! -Mike
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
57
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K