PDA

View Full Version : Proving that a triangular matrix is invertible


Icheb
Jun7-07, 02:28 PM
I have a square triangular matrix with d_{ij} = 0 for all 1 \le j < i \le n. Now I have to prove that this matrix is only then invertible when d_{ii} \ne 0 for all 1 \le i \le n.

From what I know a matrix is only then invertible when its determinant does not equal 0. I also think that the determinant of a triangular matrix is dependent on the product of the elements of the main diagonal and if that's true, I'd have the proof. However this is also where I'm stuck since I don't know how to prove that. Could someone help me there?

D H
Jun7-07, 03:56 PM
Hint: Formulate the determinant using determinant expansion by minors on the first column.

You should get a very compact expression that only involves the diagonal elements.

radou
Jun7-07, 04:04 PM
I also think that the determinant of a triangular matrix is dependent on the product of the elements of the main diagonal and if that's true, I'd have the proof. However this is also where I'm stuck since I don't know how to prove that. Could someone help me there?

It's a simple proof. Just use the definition of the determinant.

Icheb
Jun7-07, 05:17 PM
Ok, do I understand it correctly that if all elements of one line equal 0, the determinant equals 0? So I would just have to prove that the matrix is linear (Did I translate that word correctly?) and my proof would be complete? Or am I missing something?

matt grime
Jun7-07, 05:21 PM
You're missing something. It is straightfoward to show from the definition of determinant by expansion that the determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of the diagonal elements. A row of zeroes is neither here nor there.

Icheb
Jun7-07, 09:33 PM
But why wouldn't it suffice if I assume one element of the main diagonal to be 0, then I use Gaussian transformation to change the last line so it contains only 0s? Then if the last line contains only 0s the determinant would be 0 because of the linearity.

ZioX
Jun7-07, 09:59 PM
Yes, that works. However, you'd need a proof that you'll always get a row of zeros.

Besides, the proof that the determinant of a diagonal matrix is the product of the diagonal elements is similar enough.

Icheb
Jun7-07, 10:19 PM
Alright, thank you very much. :)