How fast does light travel in 1 ft?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dan001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Travel
AI Thread Summary
Light travels approximately 1 foot in 1 nanosecond when in a vacuum. The discussion centers on calculating the time it takes for light to cover 1 foot, with participants referencing the speed of light as 300,000,000 meters per second. Various humorous and complex unit conversions are introduced, including unconventional measurements like furlongs and firkins. The conversation also touches on Planck units and dimensional analysis, showcasing the playful nature of the forum. Overall, the thread combines a straightforward physics question with light-hearted banter about measurement systems.
dan001
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I was wondering if anyone could help solve my problem...

...How much time in seconds (or milleseconds) would light travel in 1ft? (assuming that it was traveling in a vacuum.)

I spent 2 and a half hours yesterday trying to solve this problem, but without much luck. I remember back in school, I would know how to do this kind of stuff, but now...well, you know.

If anyone knows the answer to this problem (and if possible, a formula), I would much apreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
speed = distance / time. Use google calculator. Welcome to PF.
 
How much time to cover 300,000,000 meters (that's about 1,000,000,000 ft)? So, how much time to cover 1 ft?
 
cesiumfrog said:
speed = distance / time. Use google calculator. Welcome to PF.


Wow, I don't believe how I could forget something so simple.

Thanks anyways for reminding me.
 
Gokul43201 said:
How much time to cover 300,000,000 meters (that's about 1,000,000,000 ft)?

um... wait, gimme just a ... o:)
 
robphy said:
gimme just a ... o:)
...and a teeny, tiny bit more. :-p
 
Light travels at 1 foot / atto-fortnight, everyone knows that.
 
mgb_phys said:
Light travels at 1 foot / atto-fortnight, everyone knows that.

You are a nerd among nerds :smile:
 
No, a real nerd uses c = 1.8 terafurlongs per fortnight
 
  • #10
mgb_phys said:
No, a real nerd uses c = 1.8 terafurlongs per fortnight

And watch them ponys run!
 
  • #11
mgb_phys said:
No, a real nerd uses c = 1.8 terafurlongs per fortnight

Um, what's that in Planck units?
 
  • #12
That would be a good homework question, what is Planck's constant in the furlong/firkin/fortnight system.
 
  • #13
mgb_phys said:
That would be a good homework question, what is Planck's constant in the furlong/firkin/fortnight system.

Mines a trick question. In Planck units c=1, hbar=1 and G=1. Yours is harder. What's the mass unit in the firkin system? Stones, right?
 
  • #14
mgb_phys said:
That would be a good homework question, what is Planck's constant in the furlong/firkin/fortnight system.

Using dimensional analysis,
h is in Joule-seconds or kg*(m/s)^2*s = kg*m^2/s

Although http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FFF_System says that firkin is a mass,
according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firkin and google, firkin is a volume: http://www.google.com/search?q=firkin+in+m^3 .
However, since it is used with water (whose density is about 1000 kg/m^3), we have an expression for the mass in kg of a firkin of water http://www.google.com/search?q=kg+in+firkin*(1000+kg/m^3)

So, since google has a problem with numerical constants in the unit conversion,
http://www.google.com/search?q=h/1000+in+(firkin)*(kg/m^3)*furlong^2/fortnight

h / 1 000 = 4.8405995 × 10-34 (firkin * (kg / (m^3)) * (furlong^2)) / fortnight


or
h = 4.8405995 × 10^(-34) (firkin of water) * (furlong^2) / fortnight


(FYI: http://www.google.com/search?q=c+in+furlongs+per+fortnight yields
the speed of light = 1.8026175 × 10^12 furlongs per fortnight)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top