How fast does light travel in 1 ft?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dan001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Travel
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for light to travel 1 foot in a vacuum. The original poster expresses difficulty in solving this problem and seeks assistance, particularly for a formula or answer.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between speed, distance, and time, with some suggesting the use of a calculator for quick answers. Others explore the conversion of light speed into various unconventional units, raising questions about dimensional analysis and unit definitions.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to clarify the problem and explore different interpretations of light speed in various units. While some participants provide reminders of basic formulas, others engage in a more humorous and theoretical discussion about unconventional measurements without reaching a consensus on the original question.

Contextual Notes

There is a mix of serious inquiry and lighthearted banter regarding the units of measurement, with references to unconventional systems and the nature of the problem itself. The original poster's request for a formula indicates a desire for foundational understanding, while the responses vary in their focus on humor and complexity.

dan001
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I was wondering if anyone could help solve my problem...

...How much time in seconds (or milleseconds) would light travel in 1ft? (assuming that it was traveling in a vacuum.)

I spent 2 and a half hours yesterday trying to solve this problem, but without much luck. I remember back in school, I would know how to do this kind of stuff, but now...well, you know.

If anyone knows the answer to this problem (and if possible, a formula), I would much apreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
speed = distance / time. Use google calculator. Welcome to PF.
 
How much time to cover 300,000,000 meters (that's about 1,000,000,000 ft)? So, how much time to cover 1 ft?
 
cesiumfrog said:
speed = distance / time. Use google calculator. Welcome to PF.


Wow, I don't believe how I could forget something so simple.

Thanks anyways for reminding me.
 
Gokul43201 said:
How much time to cover 300,000,000 meters (that's about 1,000,000,000 ft)?

um... wait, gimme just a ... o:)
 
robphy said:
gimme just a ... o:)
...and a teeny, tiny bit more. :-p
 
Light travels at 1 foot / atto-fortnight, everyone knows that.
 
mgb_phys said:
Light travels at 1 foot / atto-fortnight, everyone knows that.

You are a nerd among nerds :smile:
 
No, a real nerd uses c = 1.8 terafurlongs per fortnight
 
  • #10
mgb_phys said:
No, a real nerd uses c = 1.8 terafurlongs per fortnight

And watch them ponys run!
 
  • #11
mgb_phys said:
No, a real nerd uses c = 1.8 terafurlongs per fortnight

Um, what's that in Planck units?
 
  • #12
That would be a good homework question, what is Planck's constant in the furlong/firkin/fortnight system.
 
  • #13
mgb_phys said:
That would be a good homework question, what is Planck's constant in the furlong/firkin/fortnight system.

Mines a trick question. In Planck units c=1, hbar=1 and G=1. Yours is harder. What's the mass unit in the firkin system? Stones, right?
 
  • #14
mgb_phys said:
That would be a good homework question, what is Planck's constant in the furlong/firkin/fortnight system.

Using dimensional analysis,
h is in Joule-seconds or kg*(m/s)^2*s = kg*m^2/s

Although http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FFF_System says that firkin is a mass,
according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firkin and google, firkin is a volume: http://www.google.com/search?q=firkin+in+m^3 .
However, since it is used with water (whose density is about 1000 kg/m^3), we have an expression for the mass in kg of a firkin of water http://www.google.com/search?q=kg+in+firkin*(1000+kg/m^3)

So, since google has a problem with numerical constants in the unit conversion,
http://www.google.com/search?q=h/1000+in+(firkin)*(kg/m^3)*furlong^2/fortnight

h / 1 000 = 4.8405995 × 10-34 (firkin * (kg / (m^3)) * (furlong^2)) / fortnight


or
h = 4.8405995 × 10^(-34) (firkin of water) * (furlong^2) / fortnight


(FYI: http://www.google.com/search?q=c+in+furlongs+per+fortnight yields
the speed of light = 1.8026175 × 10^12 furlongs per fortnight)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K