Why is the TeV scale important in predicting new physics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter A/4
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the significance of the TeV scale in predicting new physics, particularly in the context of high-energy physics (HEP) as the LHC prepares to begin operations. Participants explore various theoretical frameworks that suggest the TeV scale as a critical point for new discoveries, questioning the rationale behind this scale and its implications for theories like SUSY, string theory, and others.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express curiosity about the basis for the TeV scale as a predictive tool in theories like Kaluza-Klein and unparticle physics, noting a lack of clear justification for this choice.
  • One participant references historical analysis methods, suggesting that partial wave analysis predicted new physics at 100 GeV before the discovery of the W boson.
  • Another participant mentions "no lose theorems" related to the LHC, arguing that under certain assumptions, new physics must be observed that modifies or completes the electroweak sector, supported by unitarity bounds and vacuum stability arguments.
  • Discussion includes the implications of SUSY, where naturalness arguments suggest that lightest superpartners should be found near the TeV scale, particularly in relation to the Higgs mass and fine-tuning issues.
  • One participant explains that WW scattering probabilities increase with energy, and unitarity is violated at around 1 TeV, implying that new physics must emerge at this scale to maintain a consistent theoretical framework.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the justification for the TeV scale, with multiple competing views and theories presented. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the necessity and implications of the TeV scale in predicting new physics.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the dependence of various arguments on specific theoretical frameworks and assumptions, highlighting the complexity and uncertainty surrounding the predictions related to the TeV scale.

A/4
Messages
56
Reaction score
3
When the LHC comes online in the near future, it's expected that we'll see a whole new realm of HEP. I'm curious why we actually believe this is true. For example, Kaluza-Klein inspired theories use the TeV scale as an a priori condition for their phenomenological predictions. The recent surge of unparticle physics papers does likewise. There is no obvious reason to set this scale, however.

What theories (SUSY, string-inspired, LQG, etc...), aside from Higgs, conclusively pinpoint the TeV scale as the place to look for new physics (in the same way that the W and Z were successfully predicted to appear)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A/4 said:
What theories (SUSY, string-inspired, LQG, etc...), aside from Higgs, conclusively pinpoint the TeV scale as the place to look for new physics (in the same way that the W and Z were successfully predicted to appear)?

Partial wave analysis.

It is said (I can not confirm the historicity of the process) that the discovery of W was done in two steps: First, partial wave analisys (or unitarity) predicted new physics at 100 GeV, then the W was predicted.
 
Google for LHC no lose theorems, they state under fairly easy to believe assumptions that something has to be seen at the LHC that modifies or completes the EW sector. You can actually see this based not only on unitarity bounds, but also vacuum stability arguments.

As for SuSY, well its detailed and somewhat model dependent. But on naturalness arguments, (especially with a light higgs), they tend to have their lightest superpartners somewhere in that range as well. The heavier the higgs is, the amount of finetuning goes up as a powerlaw and the hierarchy solution becomes worse and worse (it receives radiative corrections from the stop mass)
 
A/4 a couple of reasons.

If one looks at WW scattering, it is pretty easy to see that the process scales as energy squared (sometimes called s). This means that as energy increases, the probability for WW to scatter increases. At some point, this probability is greater than one, which doesn not make sense. ALL of quantum mechanics is based on probabilities being less than or equal to one.

The energy scale where WW scattering breaks unitarity is at 1 TeV. This means that we HAVE to see something happening at this energy scale, or our theory is not unitary, which would be an absolute disaster. SOME new physics (maybe just a single higgs) MUST come into save unitarity.

The motivation for SUSY is to keep the higgs mass low, which is a thread all to itself!
 
http://www.hep.lu.se/atlas//thesis/egede/thesis-node21.html

http://www.hep.lu.se/atlas//thesis/egede/thesis-img175.gif
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
11K
Replies
6
Views
2K