Improved Gas Mileage with Increased Tire Pressure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure Tire
AI Thread Summary
Increasing tire pressure by 10-20% can lead to improved gas mileage, as evidenced by a reported increase from 22.5 to 25 mpg in city driving. While this adjustment can enhance fuel efficiency, it may result in uneven tire wear, particularly with the center of the tire wearing out faster. Additionally, higher tire pressure can reduce traction, potentially increasing the risk of accidents. Other users have reported similar improvements in mileage with slight increases in tire pressure, suggesting that the findings align with general automotive experiences. Overall, while the economic benefits of improved gas mileage are appealing, the trade-offs in safety and tire longevity should be considered.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
I had my car tires inflated by 10-20%, and my mileage (mostly city) went from 22.5 to 25 mpg. Does this sound feasible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. The downside is increased asymmetric tire wear, with the middle wearing out faster than if the tire were correctly inflated. But with gas prices where they are, it still may be an economic win. Traction is less though, so there is an increased chance of crashing in some situations.
 
Very interesting.

I don't think that my tires are so overinflated, though. Assuming the tires are now at the correct pressure, do my figures above agree with automotive experience?
 
I increased my tire pressure by 2psi and saw about a 2mpg improvement in gas mileage. Sounds similar to what you are seeing.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top