Quantcast Two questions Text - Physics Forums Library

PDA

View Full Version : Two questions


rakrobn
Aug8-08, 10:57 PM
Hello, I've been looking through several posts, but its hard to get a consensus answer. I will be taking General Physics I and II next year. I don't know yet whether I will be taking it in the calculus-based or non-calculus based version.

I am looking for a textbook in which I can truly rely on with respect to learning concepts and being able to solve chapter problems through independent study as the professors at my university are, unfortunately, not interested in teaching.

In looking at many textbooks, the main issue I have is that the chapter is not helpful in solving the end-of-chapter problems. For example, many times I notice the chapter has quite easy example problems in demonstrating points, yet at the end of the chapter, I notice the sudden high difficulty in the problem sets that by using the chapter alone would be extremely difficult to solve. I understand that Physics is not just a plug-and-chug science, yet even in looking at Amazon reviews, I notice the same complaint.

My first question is: Can a person truly understand physics and apply equations to problems without using calculus or is algebra and trigonometry suffice to learn it? I hear the reason why calculus is needed is to know how the formula is derived, with the other option being memorizing it and accepting it as true.

My second question is what textbook below is best with respect to independent study alone. Here is a listing below that I could find on Amazon. If you know of any other textbook that is good for independent study, please let me know thanks.

Algebra/Trignometry based Physics:

College Physics by Alan Giambattista, Betty Richardson, Robert C. Richardson
Physics: Principles with Applications by Douglas C. Giancoli
College Physics: A Strategic Approach by Randall D. Knight, Brian Jones, Stuart Field
Physics by James S. Walker
College Physics by Hugh D. Young, Robert Geller
College Physics by Jerry D Wilson, Anthony J Buffa, Bo Lou
College Physics by Raymond A. Serway, Jerry S. Faughn, and Chris Vuille
Physics by John D. Cutnell and Kenneth W. Johnson
Conceptual Physics by Paul G. Hewitt

Calculus based Physics:

Physics for Scientists & Engineers by Douglas C. Giancoli
University Physics with Modern Physics by Hugh D. Young, Roger A. Freedman
Essential University Physics by Richard Wolfson
The Feynman Lectures on Physics, The Definitive and Extended Edition, 2nd Edition by Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, Matthew Sands
Physics for Scientists and Engineers by Paul Fishbane, Stephen Gasiorowicz, Steve Thornton
Physics for Scientists and Engineers by Paul A. Tipler
Principles of Physics: A Calculus-Based Text by Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
University Physics by Francis W. Sears, Mark W. Zemansky, and Hugh D. Young
College Physics by Francis W. Sears, Mark W. Zemansky, Hugh D. Young
Physics, 5th Edition, by David Halliday, Robert Resnick, Kenneth S. Krane
Fundamentals of Physics by David Halliday, Robert Resnick, Jearl Walker

nicksauce
Aug8-08, 11:49 PM
I think most people on these forums will agree that Halliday, Resnick, Walker is the way to go for calc-based general physics.

"My first question is: Can a person truly understand physics and apply equations to problems without using calculus or is algebra and trigonometry suffice to learn it? I hear the reason why calculus is needed is to know how the formula is derived, with the other option being memorizing it and accepting it as true."

No, in my opinion, a person cannot truly understand physics without calculus. Calculus-less physics is just artificial problems for those who don't know calculus.