What is the effect of a wire with current on Ampère's circuital law?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter valjok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Ampère's circuital law in relation to a wire carrying current. The integral form of the law, \(\oint_L \mathbf{H} \cdot \mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{\ell} = \sum I\), simplifies to \(\mathbf{H} = \frac{I}{2 \pi r}\) for a perfectly round loop orthogonal to the current. However, the author identifies that this formula cannot be applied to a current loop due to lack of symmetry, and instead, the Biot-Savart law must be used, which states \(H = \frac{I}{2r}\). The discussion concludes that bending the wire alters the magnetic field distribution, making the original formula inapplicable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ampère's circuital law
  • Familiarity with the Biot-Savart law
  • Knowledge of magnetic fields and their properties
  • Basic calculus for integral equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Ampère's circuital law
  • Explore the Biot-Savart law in detail
  • Investigate the effects of wire geometry on magnetic fields
  • Learn about magnetic field visualization techniques
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electromagnetism and magnetic field theory.

valjok
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Revising my old university lectures, I have encountered the famous law of magnetic field around a closed loop:
[tex]\oint_L \mathbf{H} \cdot \mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{\ell} = \sum I[/tex]

The integral is simplified down to a product Hl when the perfectly round loop is orthogonal to the current. In this case H is constant on the loop and length of a circle l = 2 Pi r, wherefrom we can derive the [tex]\mathbf{H} = \frac{I}{2 \pi r}[/tex].
For instance, if the first current goes into the screen while another comes out of it, we can compute the field at point R, which distance is r from both currents:
attachment.php?attachmentid=17383&stc=1&d=1233518255.png


[tex]H_R = H_{1R} + H_{2R} = (I_1 + I_2)/2\pi r[/tex]As I understand the writing, it allows us to compute the field in any point by just summing H from all circles orthogonal to the current direction. Everything looks fine until a wire of current is considered:
attachment.php?attachmentid=17384&stc=1&d=1233520005.png

Here, a wire with current I surrounds the point R. The wire consits of infinitely many points and there is the current in every point, so that each point of wire contributes a finite amount of field to R, resuling in infinite H. I suspect that my treatment of shape of current is too loose in the fromula Hl = I and must be clarified.
 

Attachments

  • current field.PNG
    current field.PNG
    3.2 KB · Views: 646
  • current field2.PNG
    current field2.PNG
    1.1 KB · Views: 580
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The simple formula HL=I cannot be used for a current loop, because the loop does not have the appropriate symmetry. The law of Biot-Savart for a current loop gives
H=I/2r.
 
Thank you, I have realized that my simplified formula describes the infinitely long stright line of current. This makes the fied round symmetric around it. Bending the wire distorts the field breaking its circle shape, the H becomes stronger in the center and the formula cannot be applied anymore. The infinite sum occurs when infinite number of stright current lines will be put tangently to the curve around the R :)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
812
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
92
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K