Stuck deriving the Hylleraas variational method

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges faced in re-deriving the Hylleraas variational method for the ground state of Helium, particularly the transition from the differential equation (5) to the variational integral (6). The original poster successfully parameterized the wavefunction but struggles with understanding how the second derivatives of the wavefunction transform into squared first derivatives in the variational formulation. They seek clarification on this derivation, noting that while potential terms are straightforward, the transition for the kinetic terms is unclear. Suggestions include reviewing the Euler-Lagrange equation and exploring resources like Bethe's text for further insights. The conversation highlights the complexities of variational methods in quantum mechanics and the need for detailed derivation explanations.
alxm
Science Advisor
Messages
1,848
Reaction score
9
Hi, first post here.
I've been trying (out of personal interest, not homework) to re-derive http://www.springerlink.com/content/mm61h49j78656107/" relatively famous calculation on the ground state of Helium from 1929. And I'm stuck at one point.

What Hylleraas did, was to parametricize the wavefunction in terms of r_1,r_2,r_{12} - the scalar electron-nuclear and electron-electron distances, which works since it's spherically symmetrical in the ground state. You insert these into the electronic Hamiltonian, do a little work with the chain rule, etc, and arrive at:
\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial r_1^2}+\frac{2}{r_1}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial r_1}+\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial r_2^2}+\frac{2}{r_1}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial r_2}+2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial r_{12}^2}+\frac{4}{r_{12}}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial r_{12}}+\frac{r_1^2-r_2^2+r_{12}^2}{r_1r_{12}}\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial r_1\partial r_{12}}+\frac{r_2^2-r_1^2+r_{12}^2}{r_1r_{12}}\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial r_1\partial r_{12}}<br /> +(\frac{1}{r_1}+\frac{1}{r_2}-\frac{1}{2r_{12}})\psi=-\frac{\lambda}{4}\psi<br />
Equation (5) in the original paper. Where lambda is the energy (Hylleraas used units of R*h=half a Hartree). So far, I'm all good. It's the next step is where I run into trouble. To quote the text (translated):

"This equation is self-adjoint after multiplying with the density function r_1r_2r_{12} and is the Euler equation of a variational problem. This variational problem is:"

<br /> \int^\infty_0dr_1\int^\infty_0dr_2\int^{r_2+r_1}_{|r_2-r_1|}dr_{12}<br /> \{r_1r_2r_{12}<br /> [(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial r_1})^2+(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial r_2})^2+<br /> 2(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial r_{12}})^2]<br /> +r_2(r_1^2-r_2^2+r^2_{12})\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial r_1}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial r_{12}}+<br /> r_1(r_2^2-r_1^2+r^2_{12})\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial r_2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial r_{12}}\\<br /> -[r_{12}(r_1+r_2)-\frac{r_1r_2}{2}]\psi^2\}=\lambda<br />
With the normalization condition:
<br /> \frac{1}{4}\int^\infty_0dr_1\int^\infty_0dr_2\int^{r_2+r_1}_{|r_2-r_1|}dr_{12}r_1r_2r_{12}\psi^2=1.<br />

Equation (6) in the original paper. So, both sides are multiplied with psi and r1r2r12 and integrated so that the normalization condition can be applied to the right side, giving the energy. (The later problem to is to fit the basis-function parameters to minimize the left side; the integrals can be manually evaluated for the basis used)

My problem here is that I still don't quite follow how he got from (5) to (6). The potential terms are easy, but the first ones..? E.g. How did \frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial r_1^2} turn into (\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial r_1})^2 etc? I've looked around quite a bit for a more detailed derivation, but I can't find one. (Closest thing was in Bethe's "QM of one and two-electron atoms" which after a hand-waving reference to using Green's theorem, skipped to the final result)

So. Can anyone give me a clue here? I've stared at this thing so long it's probably something really simple...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K