Evaluating A-Matrix Transformation for Hemitian Operator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the expression \(\langle b''|f(A)|b'\rangle\) for a Hermitian operator \(A\) and its transformation between different bases. Participants are exploring the implications of the transformation matrix and the eigenvalue relationships associated with the operator.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to derive the transformation matrix from the relationship between the bases, while others question the validity of certain steps and assumptions made in the transformations. There is also exploration of inserting completeness relations to facilitate the evaluation of the operator.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. Some have offered guidance on the use of completeness relations, while others are clarifying misunderstandings about the nature of transformation matrices and inner products.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the definitions and properties of transformation matrices versus inner products, as well as the assumptions underlying the operator's eigenvalue relationships. Participants are also navigating the constraints of the homework context, which may limit the types of solutions or methods they can employ.

Bill Foster
Messages
334
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose that [tex]f\left(A\right)[/tex] is a function of a Hemitian operator A with the property [tex]A|a'\rangle=a'|a'\rangle[/tex]. Evaluate [tex]\langle b''|f\left(A\right)|b'\rangle[/tex] when the transformation matrix from the a' basis to the b' basis is known.

[tex]\langle\beta|A|\alpha\rangle=\int dx' \int dx'' \langle\beta|x'\rangle\langle x'|A|x''\rangle \langle x''|\alpha\rangle=\int dx' \int dx'' \psi_\beta^*\left(x'\right)\langle x'|A|x''\rangle\psi_\alpha\left(x''\right)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Transformation from [tex]a'[/tex] to [tex]b'[/tex] basis:

[tex]U|a'\rangle = |b'\rangle[/tex]

Multiply both sides by [tex]a''[/tex]:

[tex]\langle a''|U|a'\rangle = \langle a''|b'\rangle[/tex]

This is the transformation matrix.

Now insert [tex]|a''\rangle\langle a''|[/tex] into [tex]\langle b''|f\left(A\right)|b'\rangle[/tex]:

[tex]\langle b''|f\left(A\right)|a''\rangle\langle a''|b'\rangle[/tex]

Now insert [tex]|a'\rangle\langle a'|[/tex] into the above:

[tex]\langle b''|a'\rangle\langle a'|f\left(A\right)|a''\rangle\langle a''|b'\rangle[/tex]

This is a transformation matrix: [tex]\hat{T}=\langle a''|b'\rangle[/tex]

And so is this: [tex]\hat{T}^*=\langle b''|a'\rangle[/tex].

So then:

[tex]\langle b''|f\left(A\right)|b'\rangle = \hat{T}^* \langle a'|f\left(A\right)|a''\rangle \hat{T}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bill Foster said:
[tex]\langle a''|U|a'\rangle = \langle a''|b'\rangle[/tex]

This is the transformation matrix.

No it isn't. In fact, it isn't even a matrix; just an inner product between two states.

Now insert [tex]|a''\rangle\langle a''|[/tex] into [tex]\langle b''|f\left(A\right)|b'\rangle[/tex]:

[tex]\langle b''|f\left(A\right)|a''\rangle\langle a''|b'\rangle[/tex]

What makes you think you are allowed to do this?


This is a transformation matrix: [tex]\hat{T}=\langle a''|b'\rangle[/tex]

And so is this: [tex]\hat{T}^*=\langle b''|a'\rangle[/tex].

Again, not matrices. Also, [itex]\langle a''|b'\rangle^{\dagger}=\langle b'|a''\rangle\neq\langle b''|a'\rangle[/itex]
 
Bill Foster said:

Homework Statement



Suppose that [tex]f\left(A\right)[/tex] is a function of a Hemitian operator A with the property [tex]A|a'\rangle=a'|a'\rangle[/tex]. Evaluate [tex]\langle b''|f\left(A\right)|b'\rangle[/tex] when the transformation matrix from the a' basis to the b' basis is known.

[tex]\langle\beta|A|\alpha\rangle=\int dx' \int dx'' \langle\beta|x'\rangle\langle x'|A|x''\rangle \langle x''|\alpha\rangle=\int dx' \int dx'' \psi_\beta^*\left(x'\right)\langle x'|A|x''\rangle\psi_\alpha\left(x''\right)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Transformation from [tex]a'[/tex] to [tex]b'[/tex] basis:

[tex]U|a'\rangle = |b'\rangle[/tex]

Multiply both sides by [tex]a''[/tex]:

[tex]\langle a''|U|a'\rangle = \langle a''|b'\rangle[/tex]

This is the transformation matrix.

Now insert [tex]|a''\rangle\langle a''|[/tex] into [tex]\langle b''|f\left(A\right)|b'\rangle[/tex]:

[tex]\langle b''|f\left(A\right)|a''\rangle\langle a''|b'\rangle[/tex]

Now insert [tex]|a'\rangle\langle a'|[/tex] into the above:

[tex]\langle b''|a'\rangle\langle a'|f\left(A\right)|a''\rangle\langle a''|b'\rangle[/tex]

This is a transformation matrix: [tex]\hat{T}=\langle a''|b'\rangle[/tex]

And so is this: [tex]\hat{T}^*=\langle b''|a'\rangle[/tex].

So then:

[tex]\langle b''|f\left(A\right)|b'\rangle = \hat{T}^* \langle a'|f\left(A\right)|a''\rangle \hat{T}[/tex]

If you have [tex]\langle b''|f\left(A\right)|b'\rangle[/tex], why not just insert [tex]\sum_{a'}|a'\rangle\langle a'|[/tex] in there so you can get the eigenvalue of [tex]f(A)[/tex]:

[tex] \sum_{a'}\langle b''|f(A)|a'\rangle\langle a'|b'\rangle=\sum_{a'}f(a')\langle b''|a'\rangle\langle a'|b'\rangle[/tex]
 
Last edited:
gabbagabbahey said:
No it isn't. In fact, it isn't even a matrix; just an inner product between two states.

Ahhh...I looked at Sakurai a little closer. You're right.

Section 1.5:

"The matrix elements of the U operator are built up of the inner products of old base bras and new base kets."


What makes you think you are allowed to do this?

If Chuck Norris can divide by zero, then I can do that.
 
jdwood983 said:
If you have [tex]\langle b''|f\left(A\right)|b'\rangle[/tex], why not just insert [tex]\sum_{a'}|a'\rangle\langle a'|[/tex] in there so you can get the eigenvalue of [tex]f(A)[/tex]:

[tex] \sum_{a'}\langle b''|f(A)|a'\rangle\langle a'|b'\rangle=\sum_{a'}f(a')\langle b''|a'\rangle\langle a'|b'\rangle[/tex]

If

[tex]A|a'\rangle=a'|a'\rangle[/tex]

Then

[tex]f\left(A\right)|a'\rangle=f\left(a'\right)|a'\rangle[/tex] ??

I was wondering how that eigenvalue relationship came into play in this problem.

Thanks.
 
Bill Foster said:
If

[tex]A|a'\rangle=a'|a'\rangle[/tex]

Then

[tex]f\left(A\right)|a'\rangle=f\left(a'\right)|a'\rangle[/tex] ??

I was wondering how that eigenvalue relationship came into play in this problem.

Thanks.

Yeah, you can prove this by Taylor expanding some function and then applying the ket, for example the exponential function:

[tex] \begin{array}{ll}\exp[mA]|a'\rangle&=\left(1+mA+\frac{m^2A^2}{2!}+\cdots\right)|a'\rangle<br /> \\ \,&=|a'\rangle+mA|a'\rangle+\frac{m^2}{2!}A^2|a'\rangle+\cdots<br /> \\ \,&=|a'\rangle+ma'|a'\rangle+\frac{m^2}{2!}(a')^2|a'\rangle+\cdots<br /> \\ \,&=\left(1+ma'+\frac{(ma')^2}{2!}+\cdots\right)|a'\rangle<br /> \\ \,&=\exp[ma']|a'\rangle[/tex]
 
So here's what I came up with. Please let me know how it looks:

[tex]\langle b^{(m)}|f\left(A\right)|b^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

Insert the following:

[tex]\sum_k |a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|[/tex]
[tex]\sum_l |a^{(l)}\rangle \langle a^{(l)}|[/tex]

[tex]\sum_k \sum_l \langle b^{(m)}|a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|f\left(A\right)|a^{(l)}\rangle \langle a^{(l)}|b^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=\sum_k \sum_l f\left(a^{(l)}\right) \langle b^{(m)}|a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|a^{(l)}\rangle \langle a^{(l)}|b^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=\sum_k \sum_l f\left(a^{(l)}\right) \langle b^{(m)}|a^{(k)}\rangle \delta_{kl} \langle a^{(l)}|b^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=\sum_k f\left(a^{(k)}\right) \langle b^{(m)}|a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|b^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=\sum_k f\left(a^{(k)}\right) \langle a^{(m)}|U^{\dagger}|a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|U|a^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=f\left(a^{(k)}\right) \langle a^{(m)}|U^{\dagger}U|a^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=f\left(a^{(k)}\right) \langle a^{(m)}|a^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=f\left(a^{(k)}\right) \delta_{nm}[/tex]
 
Bill Foster said:
So here's what I came up with. Please let me know how it looks:

[tex]\langle b^{(m)}|f\left(A\right)|b^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

Insert the following:

[tex]\sum_k |a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|[/tex]
[tex]\sum_l |a^{(l)}\rangle \langle a^{(l)}|[/tex]

[tex]\sum_k \sum_l \langle b^{(m)}|a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|f\left(A\right)|a^{(l)}\rangle \langle a^{(l)}|b^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=\sum_k \sum_l f\left(a^{(l)}\right) \langle b^{(m)}|a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|a^{(l)}\rangle \langle a^{(l)}|b^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=\sum_k \sum_l f\left(a^{(l)}\right) \langle b^{(m)}|a^{(k)}\rangle \delta_{kl} \langle a^{(l)}|b^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=\sum_k f\left(a^{(k)}\right) \langle b^{(m)}|a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|b^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=\sum_k f\left(a^{(k)}\right) \langle a^{(m)}|U^{\dagger}|a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|U|a^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=f\left(a^{(k)}\right) \langle a^{(m)}|U^{\dagger}U|a^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=f\left(a^{(k)}\right) \langle a^{(m)}|a^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=f\left(a^{(k)}\right) \delta_{nm}[/tex]

It looks like you don't actually need to add [tex]|a^{(k)}\rangle\langle a^{(k)}|[/tex] in the above, but otherwise seems fine to me.
 
Any ideas on how to do part (b)?

I'm approaching it the same way, with some differences:

[tex]\langle \textbf{p}''|F\left(r\right)|\textbf{p}'\rangle[/tex]

[tex]= \sum_{\textbf{x}'} \sum_{\textbf{x}''}\langle \textbf{p}''|\textbf{x}''\rangle \langle \textbf{x}'' |F\left(r\right)|\textbf{x}'\rangle \langle \textbf{x}'|\textbf{p}'\rangle[/tex]

[tex]\langle \textbf{x}'|\textbf{p}' \rangle = \frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}e^{i \frac{\textbf{p}'\cdot\textbf{x}'}{\hbar}}[/tex]

[tex]= \sum_{\textbf{x}'} \sum_{\textbf{x}''}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}e^{-i \frac{\textbf{p}''\cdot\textbf{x}''}{\hbar}} \langle \textbf{x}'' |F\left(r\right)|\textbf{x}'\rangle \frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}e^{i \frac{\textbf{p}'\cdot\textbf{x}'}{\hbar}}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^{3}} \sum_{\textbf{x}'} \sum_{\textbf{x}''}e^{-i \frac{\textbf{p}''\cdot\textbf{x}''}{\hbar}} \langle \textbf{x}'' |F\left(r\right)|\textbf{x}'\rangle e^{i \frac{\textbf{p}'\cdot\textbf{x}'}{\hbar}}[/tex]

Now I'm stuck.
 
  • #10
I guess those sums should be integrals.
 
  • #11
[tex]\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^{3}} \int \int e^{-i \frac{\textbf{p}''\cdot\textbf{x}''}{\hbar}} \langle \textbf{x}'' |F\left(r\right)|\textbf{x}'\rangle e^{i \frac{\textbf{p}'\cdot\textbf{x}'}{\hbar}}d^3x' d^3x''[/tex]
 
  • #12
Does this work here?

[tex]F(r)|\textbf{x}'\rangle = F(x')|\textbf{x}'\rangle[/tex]
 
  • #13
If it does, then:

[tex]\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^{3}} \int \int F\left(x'\right)e^{-i \frac{\textbf{p}''\cdot\textbf{x}''}{\hbar}} \langle \textbf{x}'' |\textbf{x}'\rangle e^{i \frac{\textbf{p}'\cdot\textbf{x}'}{\hbar}}d^3x' d^3x''[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^{3}} \int \int F\left(x'\right)e^{-i \frac{\textbf{p}''\cdot\textbf{x}''}{\hbar}} \delta^3\left(\textbf{x}''-\textbf{x}'\right) e^{i \frac{\textbf{p}'\cdot\textbf{x}'}{\hbar}}d^3x' d^3x''[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^{3}} \int F\left(x'\right)e^{-i \frac{\textbf{p}''\cdot\textbf{x}'}{\hbar}} e^{i \frac{\textbf{p}'\cdot\textbf{x}'}{\hbar}}d^3x'[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^{3}} \int F\left(x'\right)e^{-i \frac{\textbf{x}'}{\hbar}\cdot\left(\textbf{p}''-\textbf{p}'\right)}d^3x'[/tex]
 
  • #14
Bill Foster said:
Does this work here?

[tex]F(r)|\textbf{x}'\rangle = F(x')|\textbf{x}'\rangle[/tex]

while [tex]r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}[/tex], you can't make this claim. You'l have to solve this integral as a function of [tex]F(\mathbf{r})[/tex]. Also, an integral is also a sum so

[tex] \sum_{a'}|a'\rangle\langle a'|=\int|a'\rangle\langle a'|\,da'=1[/tex]

Basically your last post has it mostly right, though you can't use [tex]F(x')[/tex]. Expanding the integral for spherical coordinates:

[tex] \langle \mathbf{p}''|F(\mathbf{r})|\mathbf{p}'\rangle=\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^3}\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi'\int_{-1}^1d(\cos\theta)\int_0^\infty (r')^2F(r')\exp\left[\frac{i|\mathbf{p}'-\mathbf{p}''|\cdot\mathbf{r}}{\hbar}\right]\,dr'[/tex]
 
  • #15
Bill Foster said:
Any ideas on how to do part (b)?

I'm approaching it the same way, with some differences:

[tex]\langle \textbf{p}''|F\left(r\right)|\textbf{p}'\rangle[/tex]

[tex]= \sum_{\textbf{x}'} \sum_{\textbf{x}''}\langle \textbf{p}''|\textbf{x}''\rangle \langle \textbf{x}'' |F\left(r\right)|\textbf{x}'\rangle \langle \textbf{x}'|\textbf{p}'\rangle[/tex]

[tex]\langle \textbf{x}'|\textbf{p}' \rangle = \frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}e^{i \frac{\textbf{p}'\cdot\textbf{x}'}{\hbar}}[/tex]

[tex]= \sum_{\textbf{x}'} \sum_{\textbf{x}''}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}e^{-i \frac{\textbf{p}''\cdot\textbf{x}''}{\hbar}} \langle \textbf{x}'' |F\left(r\right)|\textbf{x}'\rangle \frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}e^{i \frac{\textbf{p}'\cdot\textbf{x}'}{\hbar}}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^{3}} \sum_{\textbf{x}'} \sum_{\textbf{x}''}e^{-i \frac{\textbf{p}''\cdot\textbf{x}''}{\hbar}} \langle \textbf{x}'' |F\left(r\right)|\textbf{x}'\rangle e^{i \frac{\textbf{p}'\cdot\textbf{x}'}{\hbar}}[/tex]

Now I'm stuck.

As before, I don't think you need the double sum. You should just have

[tex] \begin{array}{ll}\langle \textbf{p}''|F\left(\mathbf{r}\right)|\textbf{p}'\rangle&= \sum_{\textbf{r}'} \langle \textbf{p}''|F\left(\mathbf{r}\right)|\textbf{r}'\rangle \langle \textbf{r}'|\textbf{p}'\rangle<br /> \\ &=\sum_{r'}F(\mathbf{r}')\langle\mathbf{p}''|\mathbf{r}'\rangle\langle\mathbf{r}'|\mathbf{p}'\rangle\end{array}[/tex]

note the use of [tex]\mathbf{r}[/tex] instead of [tex]\mathbf{x}[/tex] because [tex]F[/tex] is a function of [tex]r[/tex], not [tex]x[/tex].
 
Last edited:
  • #16
jdwood983 said:
while [tex]r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}[/tex], you can't make this claim. You'l have to solve this integral as a function of [tex]F(\mathbf{r})[/tex]. Also, an integral is also a sum so

[tex] \sum_{a'}|a'\rangle\langle a'|=\int|a'\rangle\langle a'|\,da'=1[/tex]

Basically your last post has it mostly right, though you can't use [tex]F(x')[/tex]. Expanding the integral for spherical coordinates:

[tex] \langle \mathbf{p}''|F(\mathbf{r})|\mathbf{p}'\rangle=\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^3}\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi'\int_{-1}^1d(\cos\theta)\int_0^\infty (r')^2F(r')\exp\left[\frac{i|\mathbf{p}'-\mathbf{p}''|\cdot\mathbf{r}}{\hbar}\right]\,dr'[/tex]

Actually, this last line should read

[tex] \langle \mathbf{p}''|F(\mathbf{r})|\mathbf{p}'\rangle=\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^3}\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi\int_{-1}^1d(\cos\theta)\int_0^\infty (r')^2F(r')\exp\left[\frac{i|\mathbf{p}'-\mathbf{p}''|r'\cos\theta}{\hbar}\right]\,dr'[/tex]

I just forgot to remove the vector off of [tex]\mathbf{r}'[/tex], but is otherwise correct as is
 
  • #17
Yeah...I made a mistake on this post and since we can't delete them, I'm just erasing it all. You should be fine with what I had written in posts 15 and 16.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
When I say [tex]\textbf{x}[/tex], I mean [tex]\textbf{x}=x\hat{\textbf{x}}+y\hat{\textbf{y}}+z\hat{\textbf{z}}[/tex]

And [tex]\textbf{x}'=x'\hat{\textbf{x}}+y'\hat{\textbf{y}}+z'\hat{\textbf{z}}[/tex]
 
  • #19
jdwood983 said:
Actually, this last line should read

[tex] \langle \mathbf{p}''|F(\mathbf{r})|\mathbf{p}'\rangle=\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^3}\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi\int_{-1}^1d(\cos\theta)\int_0^\infty (r')^2F(r')\exp\left[\frac{i|\mathbf{p}'-\mathbf{p}''|r'\cos\theta}{\hbar}\right]\,dr'[/tex]

I just forgot to remove the vector off of [tex]\mathbf{r}'[/tex], but is otherwise correct as is

So evaluate this:

[tex]\langle\mathbf{p}''|F(\mathbf{r})|\mathbf{p}'\rangle=\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^3}\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi\int_{-1}^1d(\cos\theta)\int_0^\infty (r')^2F(r')\exp\left[\frac{i|\mathbf{p}'-\mathbf{p}'|r'\cos\theta}{\hbar}\right]\,dr'[/tex]

And get this:

[tex]\langle\mathbf{p}''|F(\mathbf{r})|\mathbf{p}'\rangle=\frac{4\pi}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^3} \int_0^\infty (r')^2F(r')\exp\left[\frac{i|\mathbf{p}'-\mathbf{p}'|r'\cos\theta}{\hbar}\right]\,dr'[/tex]

What next? integrate by parts?
 
  • #20
Looks like integrating by parts will get rid of the exponential leaving me something in terms of [tex]F(r')[/tex].
 
  • #21
Bill Foster said:
So evaluate this:

[tex]\langle\mathbf{p}''|F(\mathbf{r})|\mathbf{p}'\rangle=\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^3}\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi\int_{-1}^1d(\cos\theta)\int_0^\infty (r')^2F(r')\exp\left[\frac{i|\mathbf{p}'-\mathbf{p}'|r'\cos\theta}{\hbar}\right]\,dr'[/tex]

And get this:

[tex]\langle\mathbf{p}''|F(\mathbf{r})|\mathbf{p}'\rangle=\frac{4\pi}{\left(2\pi\hbar\right)^3} \int_0^\infty (r')^2F(r')\exp\left[\frac{i|\mathbf{p}'-\mathbf{p}'|r'\cos\theta}{\hbar}\right]\,dr'[/tex]

What next? integrate by parts?

You seem to have forgotten that you have a [tex]\cos\theta[/tex] in your exponential, so you must include that in your integration over [tex]d(\cos\theta)[/tex]. Note, also, that the problem suggests leaving the integral in some form for which you can't integrate any futher without numerical help (ie Mathematica, MATLAB, Maple, etc).
 
  • #22
Bill Foster said:
So here's what I came up with. Please let me know how it looks:

[tex]\langle b^{(m)}|f\left(A\right)|b^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

Insert the following:

[tex]\sum_k |a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|[/tex]
[tex]\sum_l |a^{(l)}\rangle \langle a^{(l)}|[/tex]

[tex]\sum_k \sum_l \langle b^{(m)}|a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|f\left(A\right)|a^{(l)}\rangle \langle a^{(l)}|b^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=\sum_k \sum_l f\left(a^{(l)}\right) \langle b^{(m)}|a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|a^{(l)}\rangle \langle a^{(l)}|b^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=\sum_k \sum_l f\left(a^{(l)}\right) \langle b^{(m)}|a^{(k)}\rangle \delta_{kl} \langle a^{(l)}|b^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=\sum_k f\left(a^{(k)}\right) \langle b^{(m)}|a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|b^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

[tex]=\sum_k f\left(a^{(k)}\right) \langle a^{(m)}|U^{\dagger}|a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|U|a^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

So far, so good:approve:

[tex]=f\left(a^{(k)}\right) \langle a^{(m)}|U^{\dagger}U|a^{(n)}\rangle[/tex]

Are you sure about this?:wink:
 
  • #23
jdwood983 said:
You seem to have forgotten that you have a [tex]\cos\theta[/tex] in your exponential, so you must include that in your integration over [tex]d(\cos\theta)[/tex]. Note, also, that the problem suggests leaving the integral in some form for which you can't integrate any futher without numerical help (ie Mathematica, MATLAB, Maple, etc).

Yes, and wouldn't [tex]F(x')[/tex] also have some dependency on [tex]\phi[/tex] and [tex]\theta[/tex], since [tex]x'=r'=\sqrt{x'^2+y'^2+z'^2}[/tex]?
 
  • #24
gabbagabbahey said:
So far, so good:approve:



Are you sure about this?:wink:

Isn't...

[tex]\sum_k |a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|=\textbf{1}[/tex]

...the "identity" operator?
 
  • #25
Bill Foster said:
Isn't...

[tex]\sum_k |a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|=\textbf{1}[/tex]

...the "identity" operator?

Sure, but what you've essentially done is say that

[tex]\sum_k f\left(a^{(k)}\right)|a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|=f\left(a^{(k)}\right)\sum_k |a^{(k)}\rangle \langle a^{(k)}|=f\left(a^{(k)}\right)[/tex]

How can that possibly be?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K