My question is why aren't we seeing 4 neutrons sticking together

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bhthiang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of why four neutrons do not stick together to form a stable nuclide, considering that neutrons only exert the strong nuclear force without the repulsive Coulomb force present in protons. Participants explore the nature of nuclear stability, the role of protons and neutrons, and the conditions under which stable nuclei form.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that while neutrons can clump together, they do not form stable nuclides without protons, as protons are necessary for defining an atom and its chemical identity.
  • Others mention that neutron stars consist of clumps of neutrons, but these are under extreme gravitational conditions that prevent neutron decay.
  • It is proposed that the instability of free neutrons, which decay into protons and electrons, limits their ability to form stable clumps.
  • Some participants suggest that the quantum states of neutrons may play a role in their inability to form stable configurations without protons.
  • There is a discussion about the balance of forces in nuclei, where too many neutrons lead to instability due to beta decay, while too few neutrons cannot overcome the repulsive forces between protons.
  • One participant explains that nuclei are held together by the exchange of particles, indicating that both protons and neutrons are necessary for stability, but questions arise about the specifics of this mechanism.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that neutrons do not form stable clumps without protons, but there are competing views on the implications of neutron instability and the role of quantum states. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact conditions and mechanisms that govern nuclear stability.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of stability and the nuances of nuclear interactions, which are not fully explored in the discussion.

bhthiang
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
We all know that the helium nucleus is very stable because it consists of two protons and two neutrons.
My question is why aren't we seeing 4 neutrons sticking together forming an even more stable nuclide, since neutrons exert only the strong attractive nuclear force but not the repulsive Coulomb force?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not that neutrons don't stick together but that they don't form nuclides- you have to have at least one proton to have a nuclide: no protons, no electrons and so no atom! It is, after all, the electrons that give atoms their chemical identity.
 
You do get clumps of nuetrons though.
Isn't that what a nuetron star is supposed to be?
 
Originally posted by Ace-of-Spades
You do get clumps of nuetrons though.
Isn't that what a nuetron star is supposed to be?

Left by themselves, neutrons are unstable, with a half-life of 12 mins, and decay into a proton and electron.

The presence of already existing protons curtails this. When you have the right porportion, you get a stable nucleus. Otherwise, a nucleus with too many neutrons tends to undergo beta- decay (a neutron change to a proton and emits an electron.)

Nuclei with too few neutrons are unstable also, due to the fact that there aren't enough neutrons to overcome the electrostatic repulsion of the protons.

Neutron stars are stable because of the immense gravity due to their large mass. This squeezes the neutrons together so tightly that there isn't any "room" for the electrons which must be emitted in order for the neutrons to decay. (gravity overcomes the weak force)
 
neutrons

Thanks for the fast response!
What I really want to find out is:

In their natural occurring way, why don't neutrons seek out one another and form stable clumps? Bear in mind that 2 neutrons and two protons do just that and form a very stable helium nuclide, although there is quite a bit of repulsive force between the two protons.

Could this have something to do with their quantum states being exclusive?
 


Originally posted by bhthiang
In their natural occurring way, why don't neutrons seek out one another and form stable clumps? Bear in mind that 2 neutrons and two protons do just that and form a very stable helium nuclide, although there is quite a bit of repulsive force between the two protons.

Could this have something to do with their quantum states being exclusive?

As Janus pointed out, they are unstable on their own, hence it could be assumed that that unstability precludes stable particulate formation.

The manner of formation of the helium nucleous might be something you want to investigate, first.
 


Originally posted by bhthiang
Thanks for the fast response!
What I really want to find out is:

In their natural occurring way, why don't neutrons seek out one another and form stable clumps? Bear in mind that 2 neutrons and two protons do just that and form a very stable helium nuclide, although there is quite a bit of repulsive force between the two protons.

Could this have something to do with their quantum states being exclusive?

Again, neutrons are unstable. If such a clump were to form, the neutrons would start to decay until enough protons were formed to create a stable nucleus.

It is the electrostatic repulsion of the protons with each other that would stop the process. After a certain point, the combined replusion of the protons overrides the weak interaction that causes neutron decay, preventing the formation of any more protons.
 
The nuclei are held together by the constant exchange of particles (pions, or if you prefer, quarks) which cause the protons and neutrons to change into each other. Two protons by themselves can't support that, and neither can two neutrons. So you don't see all proton or all neutron nuclei. Except for Hydrogen of course, a single proton all by its lonesome.
 
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
The nuclei are held together by the constant exchange of particles (pions, or if you prefer, quarks) which cause the protons and neutrons to change into each other. Two protons by themselves can't support that, and neither can two neutrons. So you don't see all proton or all neutron nuclei. Except for Hydrogen of course, a single proton all by its lonesome.

Do you have a reference for that statement? (the one in red)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K