What Determines the Strength of an Object's Gravity?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter brum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Strength
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the factors that determine the strength of an object's gravity, exploring concepts such as mass, density, and the gravitational pull of individual particles versus that of an entire object. Participants delve into theoretical mechanisms of gravity, including space-time distortion and the concept of gravitons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether gravity strength is determined solely by mass or if density plays a role.
  • Another participant asserts that gravity strength is reliant on mass, noting that density is derived from mass and volume, suggesting that a dense object can exert the same gravitational pull as a less dense object of larger size.
  • Questions are raised about whether each particle has its own gravitational pull or if gravity is an attribute of the object as a whole.
  • It is proposed that while each particle contributes to the gravitational pull of the object, it also exerts its own gravitational influence on nearby particles.
  • Participants discuss how a collection of particles can produce a strong gravitational pull despite each having a weak individual pull, with analogies involving dimples in a rubber sheet representing gravitational effects.
  • Two potential mechanisms for gravity are suggested: the distortion of space-time and the existence of gravitons, with some participants considering a combination of both.
  • One participant emphasizes that the combination of many small gravitational pulls can lead to a larger, collective gravitational effect, using analogies of rubber bands and dimples to illustrate the concept.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of mass and density in determining gravitational strength, and there is no consensus on whether gravity is an attribute of individual particles or the object as a whole. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the mechanisms of gravity.

Contextual Notes

Participants' statements reflect various assumptions about gravity and its mechanisms, and the discussion includes unresolved questions about the nature of gravitational interactions at the particle level.

brum
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
I have a good idea of the basics of gravity.

But I have one question...

What determines the strength of an object's gravity? Just mass?
Or does density determine the strength of the gravitation pull?


i have a follow-up question or 2 that depends on what the answer to the above question is, so i'll ask that once my above question gets answered.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The strength of gravity is reliant of an objects mass. The density of an object is derived from the equation D=m/V and so density simply means that a dense object can be smaller than an undense object and have the same gravitational pull.
 
ok. I'm going to continue asking questions regarding gravity in this thread...


does each particle have a gravitational pull? or, rather, does the object as a whole?

also, when a particle is part of an object, that particle contributes to the object's gravitational pull, correct? AND that particle also has its own, personal gravtitational pull on the nearby particles, at the same time?

if each particle has its own gravity (a weak one, obviously), how does one form a "massive object" that has a strong gravitational pull---just by simply being in the vicinity of a bunch of particles, you have a strong gravitational pull?

=======

what are the possible mechanisms for gravity (how exactly does it work?)?

as far as I know, the answer to this question is not known for certain.

the 2 possible mechanisms that I can think of are:

- distorting space-time (i.e. ball on sheet of rubber, bending the surroundings)
- gravitons (-imaginary- particles)
- mix of the above 2?

===
one little thought that just came to me: let's say you are looking at a plane. Got this in your head? A 2D plane in 3D.

Now, this 2D plane represents a collection of particles, which all lie on the plane (say, in a rough circle). There are "dimples" and "bumps" in the plane that represent the strength of the gravitational pull of each, individual particle. 1 billion particles, 1 billion dimples.

So, each particle has its own gravitational pull. Each particle has a slight pull on the surrounding particles.

With me so far?

Ok, so how does this collection of particles have 1 big gravitational pull? It just has a billion "little pulls" -- a bunch of little dimples, not one big huge dip.

And yet, in real life, this collection of particles --aka object-- has a (relatively) large gravitational pull. But -- if you look at the object as a collection of individual particles, all you see is many many dimples!

note: (in real life, it'd actually be a billion billion billion billion ... billion particles, not the "1 billion" that I used for brevity)

So how does this collection of particles, each with their own mass and thus, gravitational pull, suddenly have one, large, collective gravitational pull?
 
Originally posted by brum
does each particle have a gravitational pull? or, rather, does the object as a whole?
Each individual particle has its own pull, but to simplify calculations, we deal mostly with full objects.
also, when a particle is part of an object, that particle contributes to the object's gravitational pull, correct? AND that particle also has its own, personal gravtitational pull on the nearby particles, at the same time?
Pretty much.
if each particle has its own gravity (a weak one, obviously), how does one form a "massive object" that has a strong gravitational pull---just by simply being in the vicinity of a bunch of particles, you have a strong gravitational pull?
A lotta little forces added together equals one big force.
Ok, so how does this collection of particles have 1 big gravitational pull? It just has a billion "little pulls" -- a bunch of little dimples, not one big huge dip.
Ok, this really shouldn't be that hard. Imagine you had 100 rubber bands that each exerted a 1 lb force on an object. What's the total force?

Or rather, in your dimples analogy, if the dimples are really close together, you start getting dimples on top of dimples, making them combine to form one big one. Have you ever had poison ivy...?
 
Ok, so how does this collection of particles have 1 big gravitational pull? It just has a billion "little pulls" -- a bunch of little dimples, not one big huge dip.

Have you ever actually done this? That is, take a number of small masses: shot, say, and place it on a rubber sheet.

Each shot makes a little dimple, yes, but when two are close together, you DON'T have the two dimples coming up level with the rest of the sheet between them: what happens is you get one, larger, dimple. All of the "dimples" (distortions in space-time) combine to form one large dimple.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K