Integrating an Electric Field Due to an Arc of Charge in Polar Coordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter quarkman
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field due to an arc of charge spanning angles from 0 to π in polar coordinates. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the integration process and the treatment of the radial unit vector in polar coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to integrate the electric field expression directly in polar coordinates but encounters difficulties when converting the radial unit vector to rectangular coordinates. They question whether it is possible to perform the integration without this conversion.
  • Some participants point out that the radial unit vector is not constant and depends on the angle φ, suggesting that the conversion to rectangular coordinates should occur before integration.
  • Further questions arise about expressing the position vector in polar coordinates and the implications of circular symmetry in the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the integration process and the behavior of the unit vectors involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of the radial unit vector and the necessity of coordinate conversion, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is specifically looking for ways to maintain the integration in polar coordinates, which raises questions about the assumptions made regarding the unit vectors and their dependence on the angle.

quarkman
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
How can I not do this??

I am trying to determine the electric field due to an arc of charge which spans the angles 0 to [tex]\pi[/tex] with a total charge q. Does anyone know why I cannot integrate this directly? The only way I get the right answer is to convert [tex]a_{\rho}[/tex] (unit vector in radial direction) to x,y coordinates and then integrate. I was just wondering if I could integrate with everything still expressed in polar form:

Begin with the following formula for the electric field:

[tex]\vec{E} = \int_{0}^{\pi} \frac{\rho_{L} d\ell (-a_{\rho})}{4 \pi \epsilon R^{2}}[/tex]

(Where R is the radius of the arc and [tex]\rho_{L}[/tex] is the charge density of the arc.)

Then convert [tex]d\ell[/tex] to [tex]R d\phi[/tex] and integrate over the limits of the arc. This is all fine and dandy, (as [tex]\int^{\pi}_{0} d\phi[/tex] is obviously [tex]\pi[/tex] in this case) but when I convert from the radial unit vector to the rectangular ones [tex]a_{\rho} = \cos \phi a_{x} + \sin \phi a_{y}[/tex] I find myself very confused by the introduction of the angle [tex]\phi[/tex] again. I can do this and get the correct answer if I convert the radial unit vector to the rectangular ones first, but I want to know if it is possible to integrate without the introduction of rectangular coordinates (converting the polar electric field vector to rectangular coords after the integration is done). Thanks for any help. If I am not clear enough I can try to rephrase my problem as I enjoyed learning how to use the latex typesetting :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your radial unit vector [itex]\hat a_{\rho}[/itex] is not a constant, but a function of [itex]\phi[/itex].
I`m not sure how you did it, but from your post it looks as if you integrated oer [itex]\phi[/itex] first, and THEN expressed the radial unit vector in rectangular coordinates.
This is wrong, because then you treated [itex]\hat a_{\rho}[/itex] as a constant,
but since it dependent on the angle you should change to rectangular coordinates first and then integrate (like you did when you found the correct answer).

The resultant electric field points in the negative y-direction (if q is positive).
Ofcourse, you can express that in polar coordinates.
 
Galileo said:
Your radial unit vector [itex]\hat a_{\rho}[/itex] is not a constant, but a function of [itex]\phi[/itex].
...
The resultant electric field points in the negative y-direction (if q is positive).
Ofcourse, you can express that in polar coordinates.

Why is the unit vector [tex]\hat a_{\rho}[/tex] not constant? Doesn't it always point in a radial direction? In this case I have specified it to point towards the origin using the minus sign.

I thought the purpose of polar coordinates was to simplyfy problems with circular symmetry. But here I have had to revert to rectangular ones to solve a problem with circular symmetry! Since the general form for the electric field due to a line of charge is:
[tex]\vec{E} = \int_{0}^{\pi} \frac{\rho_{L} d\ell (\hat a_{r})}{4 \pi \epsilon R^{2}}[/tex]

where [tex]a_{r}[/tex] is the unit vector from the line of charge to the point we want to find the field. Using the definition for the unit vector we can write it in terms of the vector [tex]\vec{r}[/tex] and it's magnitude [tex]R[/tex]. Like this:

[tex]\hat a_{r} = \frac{\vec{r}}{R}[/tex]

My question/confusion is now how to express [tex]\vec{r}[/tex] in polar coordinates. Originally I thought this was:

[tex]\vec{r} = (-R a_{\rho}) + (\phi a_{\phi})[/tex]

However this does not yield the correct answer. (You will recall that I want the field at the origin.)
 
As far as I can see, only the radial vector is a non-constant quantity in your original integral (which is to give the electric field at the origin)
Use therefore:
[tex]\int_{0}^{\pi}\vec{a}_{r}d\phi=(-\vec{a}_{\phi})|_{\phi=0}^{\phi=\pi}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K