PDA

View Full Version : Quantum Mechanics


Astronomer107
Jul30-03, 10:31 PM
How do you feel about Quantum Mechanics?

Shadow
Aug12-03, 01:58 PM
Maybe there should be a step between I practically invented it and "I understand it a bit" for people (definetly not me) who understand it a lot but still wouldnt say they kenw so much they practically invented it.

Tail
Aug12-03, 05:25 PM
Cloudy picture...

Simfish
Aug13-03, 11:48 AM
The basic principles, I understand, but certainly not the mathematics (I'm only 14!).

jcsd
Aug13-03, 05:24 PM
I've had formal training in it so, I'm perfectly happy with anything at undergraduate level, though I do have to refer back to my textbooks quite alot.

Creator
Aug13-03, 11:11 PM
Originally posted by Astronomer107
How do you feel about Quantum Mechanics?

The way things are always breaking these days its always helpful to have a good mechanic in the neighborhood. [;)]


"Having a question is greater than having an answer."

Is thaaaat right?? Is having a question greater than having an answer?? [:D] [a)]

Creator

Dal
Aug14-03, 10:14 PM
There's a saying that if you understand quantum mechanics you don't understand it.

Tail
Aug15-03, 06:02 AM
Originally posted by Creator

Is thaaaat right?? Is having a question greater than having an answer?? [:D] [a)]

Creator

Picasso once said: Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.

Creator
Aug15-03, 10:47 PM
Originally posted by Tail
Picasso once said: Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.

Someone once said: Painting is useless. It's only done by those who can't master photography.[6)] [:D]

Sting
Aug16-03, 05:16 PM
General ideas? yes.

Some of the general mathematics? sort of.

Some of the advanced mathematical concepts? not yet [:)].

plus
Aug17-03, 11:37 AM
Understand it fairly well. Know more in the area of quantum information then in the quantum mechanics itself. Certainly cannot claim to have practically invented it.

zoobyshoe
Aug17-03, 03:09 PM
Speaking of Picasso, from my per-
spective quantum mechanics does
for physics what Picasso did for
the human figure.

And please don't take that the
wrong way: I think Picasso was
a horrible artist.

jcsd
Aug17-03, 03:22 PM
Originally posted by zoobyshoe
Speaking of Picasso, from my per-
spective quantum mechanics does
for physics what Picasso did for
the human figure.

And please don't take that the
wrong way: I think Picasso was
a horrible artist.

So you find it aesthically unpleasing? Well, physical theories are just meant to be functional.

McQueen
Aug18-03, 01:48 PM
In general yes. Most of the conclusions seem to have been drawn in a logical manner , it is when you cannot explain things logically that the question begins to get a bit vague.