Arranging Numbers on a Derivatives Graph: Explanation and Help

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around arranging specific numerical expressions related to a function's graph in increasing order. The expressions include values derived from the function and its derivative, focusing on their comparative magnitudes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationships between the values of the expressions, questioning the reasoning behind their order. Some participants attempt to justify their rankings based on the behavior of the function and its derivative.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and justifications for their rankings. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the expressions, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct order yet.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of an asymptote affecting the value of 0, and participants are considering the implications of the function's increasing behavior on the values being compared. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the definitions and relationships of the expressions involved.

neik
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Help me please! :confused:

graph.png


For the function f whose graph is given, arrange the following numbers in increasing order and explain why:
  • 0
  • f'(2)
  • f(3) - f(2)
  • 1/2[f(4) - f(2)]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
0 is undefined...on an asymptote

out of f'(2), f(3) - f(2) and 1/2[f(4) - f(2)]

increasing order:

1/2[f(4) - f(2)]
f(3) - f(2)
f'(2)
 
but why? :confused:
 
a. 0
b. f'(2)
c. f(3) - f(2)
d. 1/2[f(4) - f(2)]

0 is the smallest and I'll explain why in a second.
f(3) - f(2) can be rewritten as (f(3) - f(2)) / (3-2). This slope is only a tiny fraction smaller than b because if you notice the slope is gradually decreasing as x gets larger. 1/2(f(4)-f(2)) can be rewritten as (f(4)-f(2))/(4-2). This looks like the average slope over that interval which you will notice was slightly less than c (which is in turn slightly less than b)

b, c, and d are positive though because the graph increases from 0-infinity apparently so a is the smallest. Ok I pretty much did all the work for you whoops.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K