Graph f(x)=(1/8)x^3: Explanation & Sketch

  • Thread starter Thread starter 404
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphing
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the graph of the function f(x)=(1/8)x^3, focusing on its shape and scaling properties. Participants are exploring how the coefficient affects the width of the graph compared to the standard cubic function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the coefficient 1/8 on the graph's width, with some suggesting algebraic transformations to clarify the relationship. Questions arise about the scaling and how it affects the graph's appearance.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the graph's characteristics, with some participants providing insights into the relationship between the original and transformed functions. While some guidance has been offered regarding the scaling factors, there is no explicit consensus on the final interpretation of the graph's shape.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the scaling and the appearance of their graphs compared to the answer book, indicating potential discrepancies in scale or interpretation. The discussion reflects a need for clarity on how coefficients influence graph transformations.

404
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
f(x)=(1/8)x^3

I think because the 1/8 is less than 1, therefore it's wider, but if it's greater than 1, it's narrower right? I tried to graph it, but looks like mine was way to wide, and not matching what the answer book had... Can someone explain and sketch it for me? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A little algebraic trick can solve this. Isn't 1/8 * x^3 the same as (x/2)^3? That may be a little easier to see. f(2) on the original graph of x^3 is now at f(4), f(6) on the original graph is at f(12). see what's going on here?
 
Check carefully the scale of the solution in your book. This might vary from what you are drawing and cause it to look different.
 
I do see the pattern, it's doubled... but can someone just PLEASE just answer it straight forward, there's a whole bunch of those questions to do and I'm really really really confused right now...

And as for the scale, the graph was rather tiny but I know for sure mine is a lot wider than it should... :(
 
Well put two and two together. If f(6) on the old graph is f(12) now and for every f(x) on the old graph that value is at f(2x), by what factor horizantally is the graph stretched?

Edit: What threw you off was most likely that 1/8. It is tempting to just expand the entire graph by 1/8 but coefficients on graphs outside the orders (like 1/8 * x^3) actually mean a vertical scale (in this case a scaledown by a factor of 8). If the coefficient is included with x in the power (like (1/2 * x)^3) then that is a horizantal scretch. However, on linear graphs (y = mx + b), m means a vertical scale up by m or a horizantal shrink by 1/m. It's confusing yes but really the only things you need to know where the first three sentences of my edit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok, thanks, I sort of see it now. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K