Solve Flux Across a Sphere: 4πa

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics_197
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sphere
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the flux across a sphere defined by the function T(x,y,z) = -ln(x^2+y^2+z^2) and the vector field F = -grad(T). Participants explore the correct formulation of the normal vector and the integration process to arrive at the flux value, with specific attention to the discrepancies between their results and a provided answer.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the flux and arrives at an answer of 4(pi)a, questioning the correctness of an answer provided in the back of a textbook.
  • Another participant challenges the assumption that the normal vector n on the sphere is (x/z, y/z, 1), asserting that the correct normal vector should be (x/a, y/a, z/a) with unit length.
  • Subsequent replies indicate confusion over how the variable 'a' disappears from the calculations when using the correct normal vector.
  • One participant revises their calculations and reports obtaining 2(pi)a after correcting an integration error related to the limits of integration.
  • Another participant notes the need to integrate over theta and phi at constant r=a for surface integration, leading them to arrive at 8(pi)a.
  • A later reply suggests that the problem relates to Gauss' Theorem, providing a calculation that supports the 8(pi)a result, but does not resolve the overall correctness of the answers discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct formulation of the normal vector and the integration process, leading to multiple competing results (4(pi)a, 2(pi)a, and 8(pi)a). The discussion remains unresolved regarding which answer is definitively correct.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential limitations in their integration methods and assumptions about the normal vector, indicating that the integration approach may depend on the specific coordinate system used.

physics_197
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



T(x,y,z) = -ln(x^2+y^2+z^2), F = -grad(T); S is the sphere x^2+y^2+z^2=a^2

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Given:
F = (2/a^2) <x,y,z>

and the sphere x^2+y^2+z^2 = a^2

F (dot) n = (2/a^2) <x,y,z> (dot) (x/z,y/z,1)

In the end I get:

the double integral of: 2(a^2 - x^2 - y^2)^-0.5

Changing to polar coords I get:
2r / (a^2-r^2 ) drd(theta)
with limits: 0 < r < a and 0 < theta < 2pi

Once I solve it, I get an answer of: 4(pi)a, but the answer in the back is 8(pi)a
Is the answer in the back wrong? or did I make a mistake somewhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physics_197 said:
F (dot) n = (2/a^2) <x,y,z> (dot) (x/z,y/z,1)

It seems to me that you assume that the normal vector n on the sphere is (x/z, y/z, 1) which is not true.
The normal vector has unit length.
Since any vector in the sphere has length a, the normal vector n is (x/a, y/a, z/a).
Does this answer your question?
 
When I try to use that, (x/a, y/a, z/a), I get an answer without 'a' in it.
 
physics_197 said:
When I try to use that, (x/a, y/a, z/a), I get an answer without 'a' in it.

So we have:
[tex]F \cdot n = \frac 2 {a^2} \vec x \cdot \frac 1 a \vec x[/tex]

And we have: [tex]\vec x \cdot \vec x = a^2[/tex]

So how does 'a' disappear?
 
I like Serena said:
So we have:
[tex]F \cdot n = \frac 2 {a^2} \vec x \cdot \frac 1 a \vec x[/tex]

And we have: [tex]\vec x \cdot \vec x = a^2[/tex]

So how does 'a' disappear?

Yeh, I retried it and now I get 2(pi)a

When I converted to polar coords, I forgot about the rdrd(theta) part, so when i integrated wrt to r, I had (a-0) and that a canceled with the one on the bottom. When it should have been (a^2-0)
 
physics_197 said:
Yeh, I retried it and now I get 2(pi)a

When I converted to polar coords, I forgot about the rdrd(theta) part, so when i integrated wrt to r, I had (a-0) and that a canceled with the one on the bottom. When it should have been (a^2-0)

Apparently you're integrating over r and theta, but to integrate over the sphere surface, you need to integrate over theta and phi (at constant r=a).
 
I like Serena said:
Apparently you're integrating over r and theta, but to integrate over the sphere surface, you need to integrate over theta and phi (at constant r=a).

Thank you very much, I got 8(pi)a now.

Is there anyway of checking the correct answer? Because I have another question similar to it but this one doesn't have the answer at the back.
 
physics_197 said:
Thank you very much, I got 8(pi)a now.

Is there anyway of checking the correct answer? Because I have another question similar to it but this one doesn't have the answer at the back.

Yes, this seems to me a problem that is leading to Gauss' Theorem, which is:
a65fd4259c814deaad6e1651e155156b.png


With div F = 6/a^2 and the volume of the sphere being 4/3 pi a^3, you can see that

[tex]\int \nabla \cdot F dV = \frac 6 {a^2} \int 1 dV = \frac 6 {a^2} \times \frac 4 3 \pi a^3 = 8 \pi a[/tex]
[EDIT]I've put in an extra step in the above formula[/EDIT]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K