Virial temperatures - why does this equality hold?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gomboc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the equality for virial temperatures in a gas of protons and electrons, specifically showing that the temperature T can be expressed as T ≈ (m_p σ²)/(2k) = 5×10⁶ (σ/(3×10⁵ m/s))². The key steps involve converting the proton mass (m_p) to MeV, using the Boltzmann constant (K_B), and relating average particle velocity (σ) to temperature. The final expression simplifies to T = 5×10⁶ (ρ/(3×10⁵))² Kelvin, highlighting the relationship between temperature and particle dynamics in astrophysical contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy in particle physics
  • Familiarity with the Boltzmann constant (K_B) and its units
  • Knowledge of relativistic and non-relativistic particle behavior
  • Basic concepts of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the virial theorem in astrophysics
  • Learn about the implications of degeneracy pressure in stellar evolution
  • Explore the relationship between temperature and particle velocity in ideal gases
  • Investigate the properties of ultra-relativistic fermions and their energy distributions
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students studying thermodynamics in astrophysical contexts will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in stellar dynamics and the behavior of gases under extreme conditions.

gomboc
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I've done a problem which makes some basic assumptions about an gas of protons and electrons to find that given each electron or proton has kinetic energy [tex]KE = \frac{3}{4}m_p\sigma^2[/tex] and also that each particle has average energy [tex]\frac{3}{2}kT[/tex], then we can show that the temperature as

[tex]T \approx \frac{m_p \sigma^2}{2k}[/tex]

This is fine - it was easy enough to show. But the question asks to show that

[tex]T \approx \frac{m_p \sigma^2}{2k} = 5\times10^6 \left(\frac{\sigma}{3\times 10^5\ m/s}\right)^2[/tex]

I can't figure out why the right half of the equality is true. It's easy to test, but I can't seem to show why it might be analytically true. Note that [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the average particle velocity and [tex]m_p[/tex] is the proton mass.

Basically, I need to show why [tex]\frac{m_p}{2k} = 5\times 10^6 \cdot \left(\frac{\sigma}{3\times 10^5\ m/s}\right)^2[/tex] and I have no idea how to do that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Mr. gomboc,

This is how to procede:
  1. First convert the masse mp to MeV, divide it by the 2 and you'll get roughly 500 MeV.

    [itex]m_p/2 \approx500 MeV[/itex]

    for K:

    [itex]K_B\approx8.6*10^{-5}eV*Kelvin^{-1}[/itex]

    and for c:

    [itex]c\approx3*10^8 m/s[/itex]
  2. Separate the results into 5 MeV and [itex]100 /c^2[/itex]. Then put [itex]100 /c^2[/itex] into a fraction with [itex]ρ^2[/itex] and K. Rise up the square to the entire fraction.

    [itex]\frac{m_p*ρ}{K_B}\approx5 *10^6 eV*\left(\frac{10*ρ}{(3*10^8 m/s)*\sqrt{8.6*10^{-5}eV}}\right)^2[Kelvin][/itex]
  3. Simplify eV with eV and you will end up with the needed expression.

    [itex]T=5 *10^6*\left(\frac{ρ}{3*10^5}\right)^2[Kelvin]^*[/itex]

Notice that if you make the assumption that the gaz is degenerate, it allows you to find out the energy as:

[itex]E\approx K_B*T=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{ρ}{3*10^5}\right)^2 KeV[/itex]

If you deal with ultra-relativistic fermions then it gives:

[itex]E\approx\frac{1}{2} KeV[/itex]

which is clearly neglected in comparaison to the energy at rest of one electron:

[itex]E_{0e^+}= 512 KeV[/itex]

even more compared to that of a nucleon:

[itex]E_{0n}= 0.9 GeV[/itex]

It's interesting to put our results in contrast with observations. What happen in the core of a cooler white dwarf star is, with the decreasing of temperature, the core become thermically "static" because it's difficult to "squeech" the matter inside, without any internal heat provided by the fusion reactions of hydrogen. The star dies.


Sorry to be too explanatory. Good luck.


*Note: assuming that [itex]ρ[/itex] is in [itex]m/s[/itex]!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K