Does the given wavefunction satisfy conservation of probability?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a wavefunction and its relation to the conservation of probability in quantum mechanics. The original poster presents a specific wavefunction and seeks to demonstrate that it satisfies the conservation equation involving probability distribution and probability current.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the probability distribution and current, and questions how these derivatives satisfy the conservation equation. Some participants note discrepancies in the derivatives and express concern about fitting them into the conservation equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants identifying errors in the calculations and clarifying aspects of the derivatives. There is no explicit consensus yet, but participants are actively engaging with the problem and correcting each other's mistakes.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of demonstrating conservation of probability using a specific wavefunction, and there are indications of missing or miscalculated terms in the derivatives being discussed.

c299792458
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a wavefunction [itex]\psi = \pi^{-1\over 4}(1+it)^{-1\over 2} \exp{({-x^2\over 2(1+it)})}[/itex]

I want to show that it satisfies the conservation of probability.

Homework Equations


[itex]\partial_t P +\partial_x j =0[/itex] --(*)

The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the probability distribution to be [itex]P=\pi^{-1\over 2}(1+t^2)^{-1\over 2} \exp{({-x^2\over (1+t^2)})}[/itex] and the probability current [itex]j=ix\pi^{-1\over 2}(1+t^2)^{-3\over 2} \exp{({-x^2\over (1+t^2)})}[/itex]

This gives [itex]\partial_t P = -t\pi^{-1\over 2}(1+t^2)^{-5\over 2} (t^2-2x^2+1)\exp{({-x^2\over (1+t^2)})}[/itex] and [itex]\partial_x j = i\pi^{-1\over 2}(1+t^2)^{-5\over 2} (t^2-2x^2+1)\exp{({-x^2\over (1+t^2)})}[/itex]

But how are they do they satisfy (*)?

tHanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
c299792458 said:
[itex]\partial_t P +\partial_x j =0[/itex] --(*)


This gives [itex]\partial_t P = -t\pi^{-1\over 2}(1+t^2)^{-5\over 2} (t^2-2x^2+1)\exp{({-x^2\over (1+t^2)})}[/itex] and [itex]\partial_x j = i\pi^{-1\over 2}(1+t^2)^{-5\over 2} (t^2-2x^2+1)\exp{({-x^2\over (1+t^2)})}[/itex]

But how are they do they satisfy (*)?

If equation (*) is satisfied then probability IS conserved. And your derivatives of P and of j show just that.
 
@grzz:

Thanks, I know that! The problem is notice how the 2 partial derivatives are not exactly equal! My aim is to fit them into (*).
 
Sorry! I missed the extra t in the derivative of P.
 
@grzz:

Also the extra [itex]i[/itex] in the 2nd expression :(
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K