Explaining Why 70 Decibels Don't Double in a Room

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mikej_45
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decibels Sound
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of sound intensity and decibel levels, specifically addressing why adding two machines that each produce 70 decibels does not result in a total of 140 decibels. Participants explore the logarithmic nature of decibels and the mathematical calculations involved, seeking clarification on the underlying principles.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests an explanation for why the decibel level does not simply double when two identical sound sources are combined.
  • Another participant explains that decibels are logarithmic, noting that the total power of sound sources is the sum of their individual powers, but the logarithm of a sum is not equal to the sum of the logarithms.
  • A participant expresses difficulty in understanding the mathematical calculations related to decibel levels, specifically how to derive the total from individual contributions.
  • One participant provides a detailed calculation showing how to arrive at 73 dB when adding the sound intensity of two machines, emphasizing the logarithmic rules involved.
  • Another participant summarizes that doubling the energy level results in an increase of about 3 dB, illustrating this with the example of 70 dB increasing to 73 dB.
  • A participant offers a layman's explanation of logarithms and decibels, discussing their relevance to human perception of sound and the practical advantages of using decibels for comparison.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the logarithmic nature of decibels and the mathematical principles involved, but there is no consensus on the best way to explain these concepts in simpler terms. Some participants express confusion about the calculations, indicating that the discussion remains partially unresolved regarding clarity and understanding.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about logarithmic calculations and how they relate to sound intensity, indicating a potential gap in understanding the foundational concepts of sound measurement.

mikej_45
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Ok so will someone please explain to me why it is that when you have a machine that produces 70 decibels in a room and add an identical machine that also produces 70 decibels to that room, the decibels don't double... my book is very vague about this and does not explain it well... any help would be appreciated. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The decibel is a unit proportional to the logarithm of the sound power level. When you have two sources of sound, the total power is typically the sum of the two individual powers, but the logarithm of a sum of numbers is not equal to the sum of the logarithms.

log(a+b) is not the same as log(a) + log(b)

So you can not expect the decibel level to be the sum of the individual decibel levels. But you can calculate the total decibel level from the individual ones.

In this case, it will be 70 + 10log(2). Do you understand why ?
 
Last edited:
explain logarithm in laymans terms please
 
Umm...thats about what my book says...I do know that the decibels won't double...I guess I just can't figure out how to do the math to get it to work.

So If the inensity level of one machine is 70 dB(decibels)

β = 10 log (1.0×10-5 W/m2) = 70 dB (decibels)
1.0×10-12 W/m2

(-5) - (-12) = 7 so you get 10 to the power of 7...70 dB

and when you add one more machine it doubles the energy input into the sound...thereby doubling the intensity:

my problem is that I don't understand how this works:

β = 10 log (2.0×10-5 W/m2) = 73 dB (decibels)
1.0×10-12 W/m2

How do these numbers come anywhere close to 73 dB? Maybe I just don't understand logs...anyone able to explain this in simplified terms...
 
[tex]\beta = 10~log( \frac{2.0*10^{-5}} {1.0*10^{-12}}) = 10~log(2.0*10^7)<br /> = 10*[log(2) + log(10^7)] = 10log(2) + 70 = 3.01 + 70 = 73.01~dB[/tex]

Remember the rules for logarithms : log(a*b) = log(a) + log(b) and log(a/b) = log(a) - log(b)
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the help, sometimes its as easy as seeing it done I guess. Thanks again.
 
Simply put, doubling the energy level (audio or radio frequency) adds 3 Db. So doubling 3 Db = 6 Db, doubling 70 Db = 73 Db. The same rules apply to calculating the gain of directional antennas.
 
ricemike said:
explain logarithm in laymans terms please

Logs are used because its easy to describe the ratio and its represents how our body responds to the sound.

0 db is defined as the lowest threshold of hearing, its at about the level of pressure the air molecules bouncing off the eardrum create or just plain incredibly quiet.

All sound is referenced to that level. But rather than say that this machine is 10 million times the reference level and that if you add another machine then its 20 million times reference this still doesn't mean too much. What if the next machine is 100 million times the reference level? How can you compare those huge numbers? What do they mean to our ears?

Instead you say the machine is 70 db and if you add the other its 73 db. And if it was 100 million times larger than reference its 80 db.

The term decibel means one-tenth of a bel. The difference in level between 70db and 80db is one bel and to you that would be about equal to twice as loud. The smallest level difference noticeable is one decibel and hence why its used to give more distinction between the doubling/halving of sound levels.

The threshold of pain for sound levels is 120 db which is 10 quadrillion times the reference level of pressure. A 747 plane is 100 times that level of pressure at 140db. Our hearing has a very large range of pressures it can respond to and using decibels makes it easy to understand (hopefully) in terms that can easily be compared.

There's more to it but that should help explain the mystery a little better in layman's terms.

Cliff
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 117 ·
4
Replies
117
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K