View Full Version : triple integral
queenstudy
Dec28-11, 01:05 PM
we all know that triple integral can be solved by either cartesian coordinates , spherical ,or cylindrical coordinates
i just need like some advice in knowing when the variable used is constant and when it is not
for example : r in cylindrical coordinates can it be constant or not?? because i always see it in terms of y and z like that
and any advice would be very helpful and thank you
I like Serena
Dec28-11, 03:06 PM
Hi queenstudy!
Can you give a couple of examples of the integrals you mean?
Taken literally, if you keep r in cylindrical coordinates constant, you have a double integral, meaning you integrate over a cylindrical surface instead of a cylindrical volume.
queenstudy
Jan1-12, 01:19 AM
Hi queenstudy!
Can you give a couple of examples of the integrals you mean?
Taken literally, if you keep r in cylindrical coordinates constant, you have a double integral, meaning you integrate over a cylindrical surface instead of a cylindrical volume.
by fixing the plane Z=z change the domain of definitoin of the triple integral f(x,y,z) where D is
D=(x,y,z) belongs to R cube and it is the intersection of the sphere and cone (icecream cone) sphere xsquare +y square + z square =2 and z=xsquare + y square
z is positive
in cartesian coordinates
my question here is when i do my projection i will have a circle , and if i want it in cartesian i need like 8 integrals because the plane Z=z should be cut twice and for each domain the intersection is a circle and in each circle we have y and x positive x and y negative and one positive and one negative so can i replace those with r and theta and save time and work and still in cartesian or not??
do you have any extra double and triple integral because i solved on google and want some more and thank you thank you twice serena for helping me out
I like Serena
Jan1-12, 09:43 AM
Hmm, as yet I'm having trouble understanding what you write...?
You appear to refer to the integral (polar):
$$
\int_{r=0}^{r=R} \int_{\theta=0}^{\theta=2\pi} \int_{\phi=0}^{\phi={\pi \over 4}} ... d\phi d\theta dr
$$
Or cartesian:
$$
\int_{x=-\frac R 2 \sqrt 2}^{x=+\frac R 2 \sqrt 2} \int_{y=-\sqrt{R^2-x^2}}^{y=+\sqrt{R^2-x^2}} \int_{z=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}^{z=\sqrt{R^2-x^2-y^2}} ... dz dy dx
$$
Does this look like what you mean?
queenstudy
Jan1-12, 01:13 PM
what you wrote is true but i am supposed to write z as two constants, and when you study x and y , you must write in terms of constant K , thus in both answers you wrote they arent correct ,
let me ask a simpler question:
i should write the domain in cartesian may i write x and y in polar coordinates and still call them cartesian because if i keep them in cartesian , x and y will have 4 domains when:
1) x and y postive ; 2) x and y negative; 3) x positive and y negative ; 4) x negative and y postive
i hope i explained my question better
I like Serena
Jan1-12, 03:50 PM
Well, you can rearrange the cartesian integral so z is integrated last.
In that case you would need to split the integral into 2 integrals.
One integral for z from 0 to ##\frac R 2 \sqrt 2## and one from ##\frac R 2 \sqrt 2## to R.
You would not need to split the x or y integrations though.
Perhaps you can show what you think it might be?
Cartesian means not-polar, but why do you think you would have to?
There is no need to split x and y in the 4 domains you mention.
queenstudy
Jan2-12, 12:06 AM
because according to our proffesor when x is negative y has the possibility to be positive or negative right? so we have two cases
now is x is positive then y can be either positive or negative right? so we also have two possibilities , thus we have 4 cases thats and that is only the case of the intersection of the plane z=constant with the cone
if we do it with the sphere inside the domain we will obtain the same 4 parts thus the total will be 8 parts which is long
that is why we choose polar here for a circle or to me be more specific a full disk because r is only positive and theta is between zero and two pie
I like Serena
Jan2-12, 03:00 AM
I think you're mixing up a single integral with higher dimensional integrals.
If you have a single integral to find the area of (part of) a circle disk, you have the problem that y has a negative and positive value and you have to choose between one of them.
If you have a double integral over a circle disk, y runs from the negative value to the positive value, which covers the entire circle disk.
So there is no need to split up the integral.
queenstudy
Jan2-12, 04:02 AM
but in class when i we projected the domain we got a circle , and it got 4 domains where x and y contain the domain of the circle
okay if we have a disk on the xoy axis and i want to make double integration with respect to x and y dont i get 4 parts of the circles thus 4 domains?? then we use polar coordinate and becomes a simple integration right????????
if this is true , MY question is that can r and theta be considered also as cartesian coordinates??????
I like Serena
Jan2-12, 08:59 AM
Can you show me integrals of what you mean?
As for your question whether r and theta can be considered cartesian coordinates, I believe we covered that in your other thread.
All I can say is that the word "cartesian" means x and y, which is not r and theta.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.