Propane to Plutonium Conversions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Arctic Fox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Propane
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores the feasibility of converting Thermoelectric Generators (TEGs) designed for gasoline and propane to operate using heat generated from radioactive fuels. Key considerations include the necessity of thick lead shielding to protect against radiation, although it is noted that the heat from decaying isotopes can be harnessed without a controlled reaction. The conversation highlights existing applications in space probes like Voyager 1 and Voyager 2, which utilize similar principles for power generation. Overall, the potential for using naturally decaying radioactive materials for energy generation is acknowledged as an intriguing concept.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Thermoelectric Generators (TEGs)
  • Knowledge of radioactive decay and isotopes
  • Familiarity with radiation shielding techniques
  • Basic principles of power generation from heat
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design and operation of Thermoelectric Generators (TEGs)
  • Study the principles of radioactive decay and heat generation
  • Explore radiation shielding materials and their effectiveness
  • Investigate existing applications of radioactive materials in power generation for space exploration
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and energy researchers interested in alternative power generation methods, particularly those involving radioactive materials and thermoelectric technology.

Arctic Fox
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
LOL!

There are Thermoelectric Generators that work on gasoline and/or propane that seem to work quite well on those fuels.

How hard would it be to convert these to operate from the heat of radioactive fuels? (provided that the fuels were available)

Thick lead shielding, I suppose, would be on the top of the list. What else would have to be done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm surprised that no one was drawn into this thread by your question, even over the course of so many months. The question is actually quite interesting.

Any decaying isotopes generate an amount of heat, which can then be used to generate power without the need for a controlled reaction, or any reaction at all. In fact, many space probes (voyager 1, voyager 2, cassini, etc) generate their power in this way, as the sun tends to be too distant for the use of solar panels.

Provided that fuels are readily available, you seem correct that shielding would be first priority. The fuel itself need not be maintained or controlled in any way- it is simply required to exist and decay naturally as all radioactive substances do. Without a reaction occurring, lead sheilding might not be necessary, though some protection will be needed. Alternatively, the entire device could simply be buried in the ground.

Come on people, you know that you've all allways wanted a nuclear device burried in your backyards!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
9K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 118 ·
4
Replies
118
Views
13K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K