FulhamFan3
- 134
- 0
What is the difference between a desktop environment and a windows manager? Why do I need them both?
The discussion revolves around the differences between desktop environments and window managers, their necessity, and user experiences with various systems. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of graphical user interfaces in computing, particularly in relation to Linux and its alternatives.
Participants express differing opinions on the necessity of desktop environments versus window managers, with some advocating for the use of both while others prefer a minimal setup. There is no consensus on the best graphical environment for older hardware, as experiences vary widely.
Participants mention specific hardware limitations, such as RAM and CPU speed, which may affect the performance of different desktop environments and window managers. The discussion does not resolve the performance issues raised, nor does it clarify the best configurations for older systems.
This discussion may be useful for users exploring graphical user interfaces in Linux, particularly those with older hardware looking for lightweight options, as well as those interested in the distinctions between desktop environments and window managers.
FulhamFan3 said:I've been a windows/dos guy my whole life. I'm pretty much trying to find something that mirrors windows 3.1 where the graphical environment is pretty much a visual shell for DOS. I have a computer than ran windows 98 pretty competently(pentium 233). I've tried KDE and that was horribly slow and bloated. People tell me that redhat should work at least as well as Win98 but that's BS. They tell me for my system I can only run the command line but if Win98 runs well then some sort of linux GUI should work at least as well. Any recommendations?