Lens/Radius of Curvature Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnwalton84
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curvature
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving lenses, specifically focusing on the radius of curvature and the effects of different refractive indices on lens behavior. The original poster is working with a bi-convex lens made of crown glass and is attempting to understand the implications of the lens maker's equation in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster considers using the lens maker's equation but questions the implications of equal radii of curvature. Another participant clarifies the sign convention used in the equation, suggesting that while R_1 is positive, R_2 is negative. The original poster then expresses gratitude for this clarification.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of the lens maker's equation and clarifying the sign conventions involved. The original poster has raised additional questions regarding a related problem about chromatic aberration and the focal length of a flint glass lens, indicating that further exploration is needed.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is navigating multiple aspects of lens behavior, including radius of curvature and chromatic aberration, while adhering to homework constraints that may limit the information they can access or utilize.

johnwalton84
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm working through some questions on lenses, and I'm a bit stuck on this one involving radius of curvature.

The part of the question I'm having difficulty with is

The lens is made of crown glass of refractive index n=1.51. The radii of both surfaces is the same. What is the radius of curvature of the surfaces?

The lens is bi-convex ([tex]f=+20cm[/tex]). The first part of the question involves finding heights, natures and magnifications of objects which is fine, but this part doesn't make any sense. I thought about using the Lens' Maker's equation but if [tex]R_1=R_2[/tex] would the right-hand-side of this equation not equal zero?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
sign convention

johnwalton84 said:
I thought about using the Lens' Maker's equation but if [tex]R_1=R_2[/tex] would the right-hand-side of this equation not equal zero?
No. The usual form of the lens maker's equation assumes a sign convention such that if the center of curvature is on the right side of the lens surface then the radius is positive. Thus [itex]R_1[/itex] is positive, but [itex]R_2[/itex] is negative.
 
I see, thanks :cool:
 
Having said that, there's another part to that same question that I'm not sure of. It says

A flint glass lens is placed in contact with the crown glass lens. The refractive index of the flint glass is 1.632 for blue light and 1.615 for red light. What is the focal length of the flint glass lens that would compensate for the chromatic aberration of the crown glass lens?

and I'm not sure where to go with it...
 
achromatic doublet

Look up "achromatic doublet": Two lenses (of different dispersive powers) used together to correct chromatic dispersion. The basic idea is to create a composite lens that focuses the red and blue light at the same point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K