Calc. r & Compare Centrifugal & Magnet Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lorax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Centrifugal
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the radius of curvature in the context of forces acting on a particle moving in a magnetic field, specifically comparing centrifugal and magnetic forces. The subject area includes concepts from circular motion and electromagnetism.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore how to calculate the radius of curvature and question the relationship between centrifugal force and magnetic force. Some suggest providing a specific problem for clearer guidance.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations of centrifugal force being examined. Some participants offer insights into the nature of forces in non-inertial frames, while others emphasize the magnetic force as the centripetal force in the context of particle motion.

Contextual Notes

There are ongoing debates about the existence and definition of centrifugal force, with references to its treatment in different frames of reference. Participants also mention the need for specific problem details to facilitate further discussion.

Lorax
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
=mv^2
----------R
r


How do you calculate the r on the side?

Also is centrifugal force = to magnet force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lorax said:
=mv^2
----------R
r


How do you calculate the r on the side?

Also is centrifugal force = to magnet force?

Depends on the problem.Give us a specific problem & we'll tell how to compute the "r",if u really have no idea.
Nope,the magnetic force has a centripetal effect,not a centrifugal effect.

Daniel.
 
Lorax, don't forget that centrifugal force doesn't actually exist.
 
Sirus said:
Lorax, don't forget that centrifugal force doesn't actually exist.

WHAT? It definitely exists.It's an inertial force (the name says:"centrifugal inertial force") and appears in every system which undergoes nonlinear movement.But only in the nonienrtial(accelerated) reference system.Did u ever go with a car/bus and took a turn...?

Daniel.
 
In a particle accelerator, an alpha particle with a mass of 6.64 x10^-27 kg is moving with a speed of 2.50x10^7 m/s. It is moving perpendicularily through a magnetic field of intensity 0.150 T. Using appropriote equations and method find the radius of curvature of its path.

Hope that helps
 
dextercioby said:
WHAT? It definitely exists.It's an inertial force (the name says:"centrifugal inertial force") and appears in every system which undergoes nonlinear movement.But only in the nonienrtial(accelerated) reference system.Did u ever go with a car/bus and took a turn...?

Daniel.

When you take a turn in a bus, although it may seem like a force is pushing you against the wall of the bus, this is not infact occurring. The reason you feel pushed is because you instantaneous velocity at that point is tangental to your circular path; your body is trying to travel into the wall.

Draw a free-body diagram of an object in circular motion. Do you draw a force vector pointing out of the circle? I hope not...

I think you and I have the same understanding of this concept, but are debating the semantic aspect, which is ultimately useless. According to Wikipedia, which explains the concept well, centrifugal force is a fictitious force. Here is their explanation of that. I guess I must admit that centrifugal force does exist, but I do not think circular motion is best thought of using it, especially at the high school level. It does not exist as a force the way other forces (such as the centripetal force) do in the inertial reference frame we are concerned with.

---------------

Lorax:

In your question, the magnetic force is the centripetal force for the circular motion of the particle. Set [itex]F_{m}[/itex] equal to [itex]F_{c}[/itex], and try to develop an expression for radius as a function of things you can find, such as mass, velocity, magnetic field strength, etc.
 
I prefer to consider only forces that are apparent to an inertial observer to be "real". It is convenient to think about centrifugal force as "real", but not completely correct in conventional mechanics.

For a more rigorous treatment of this, read the D'Alembert's formulation of Newton's laws to incorporate inertial forces.
 

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K