Solving Equation: (x^2 + 4x) / 3 + 84 / (x^2 + 4x) = 11 - Step by Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter roger
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation (x^2 + 4x) / 3 + 84 / (x^2 + 4x) = 11, which falls under algebraic equations, specifically focusing on polynomial expressions and their manipulation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods for solving the equation, including substitution of variables and questioning the interpretation of the equation's structure. Some suggest alternative approaches without substitution, while others discuss the implications of the equation being of higher order.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing different perspectives on solving the equation. Some have provided insights into the complexity of the problem, while others have raised questions about the clarity of notation and the efficiency of proposed methods.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the equation being a fourth-order polynomial, which introduces complexity in finding solutions. Participants also discuss the limitations of algebraic methods for higher-order equations.

roger
Messages
318
Reaction score
0
hi ,

I wanted to find out all the possible ways to solve :

(x^2 + 4x) / 3 + 84 / (x^2 +4x) = 11


Please could you show me in each case the method of working out .


Thanks a lot.


Roger
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are infinite ways of "solving" an equation.
For example, you may always insert a "solving step" by adding a-a=0 to one side of an equation (where a is some number).

Hence, we are more interested in finding EFFICIENT ways of solving an equation, rather than POSSIBLE ways.

In your case, it seems the simplest way of solving this, is to introduce the variable:
[tex]y=x^{2}+4x[/tex]
Multiplying your original equation by "y", and rearranging, gives:
[tex]\frac{1}{3}y^{2}-11y+84=0[/tex]

Use this in your further calculations.
 
roger said:
(x^2 + 4x) / 3 + 84 / (x^2 +4x) = 11
Might be me being stupid but does this equation mean [tex]\frac{(x^2 + 4x)}{\frac{3 + 84}{(x^2 +4x)}} = 11[/tex] ?

The Bob (2004 ©)
 
The Bob said:
Might be me being stupid but does this equation mean [tex]\frac{(x^2 + 4x)}{\frac{3 + 84}{(x^2 +4x)}} = 11[/tex] ?

The Bob (2004 ©)

That's what I thought.
 
roger's notation is quite consistent with how you usually plug in formulas in a computer program, in which case the expression is to be read as:
[tex]\frac{x^{2}+4x}{3}+\frac{84}{x^{2}+4x}}=11[/tex]
 
arildno said:
roger's notation is quite consistent with how you usually plug in formulas in a computer program, in which case the expression is to be read as:
[tex]\frac{x^{2}+4x}{3}+\frac{84}{x^{2}+4x}}=11[/tex]

Thanks, but is there any other method without substituting for y ?

I'm assuming substituting for y, is what you meant by...'' introduce the variable '' ?



Roger
 
Yes.That's what he meant.I hope u solved the eq.One more thing though,please learn how to edit formulas with Tex.People might get confused due to your inability of getting them clear with what u want...

Daniel.
 
[tex]\frac{x^{2}+4x}{3}+\frac{84}{x^{2}+4x}}=11[/tex]

=> [tex]\frac{[(x^2 + 4x)(x^2 + 4x)]+(84\times3)}{3x^2 + 12x}=11[/tex]

It is another way to solve it up it would take a while and would not be benifical at all.

The Bob (2004 ©)
 
Forget it,Bob.It's 4-th order.It would take a couple of hours to solve it...

Daniel.
 
  • #10
dextercioby said:
Forget it,Bob.It's 4-th order.It would take a couple of hours to solve it...
I know. That is why I said it was unbenifical because it would take so long to solve.

[tex]\frac{x^4 + 8x^3 + 16x^2 +252}{3x^2 + 12x} = 11[/tex]

The Bob (2004 ©)
 
  • #11
Well this has made me curious.

How would the 4th order equation be solved or any other similar equation of same or higher order ?

Roger
 
  • #12
No higher order than 4 general algebraic equation can be solved.This was shown round 200 yrs ago by Abel and Ruffini.

Check out the wolfram site.Search for "quartic".

Daniel.
 
  • #13
Another solution procedure is the guess&try method.
Occasionally, it works surprisingly well.
 
  • #14
Or you could do a numeric solution with a computer... but i don't think that's how this praticular problem was meant to be solved. But its true no equation can be solved by traditional algebraic methods in orders higher than 4th.
 
  • #15
dextercioby said:
No higher order than 4 general algebraic equation can be solved.This was shown round 200 yrs ago by Abel and Ruffini.

Check out the wolfram site.Search for "quartic".

Daniel.

There cannot exist a formula using only roots because there exist solutions to polynomial equations of degree 5 or higher that cannot be written in terms of roots.

I would not use the phrase "cannot be solved"!
 
  • #16
Sorry,you're right...I went too far with the generalization and used inappropriate words.

It won't happen... :wink:

Daniel.
 
  • #17
[tex]\frac{x^4 + 8x^3 + 16x^2 +252}{3x^2 + 12x} = 11[/tex]

[tex]x^4 + 8x^3 + 16x^2 + 252 = 33x^2 + 132x[/tex]

[tex]f(x) = x^4 + 8x^3 - 17x^2 -132x + 252 = 0[/tex]

f(3) = 0

f(2) = 0

[tex](x - 3)(x - 2)( x^2 +13x + 42) = 0[/tex]

Problem is that the answer to [tex]x^2 +13x + 42[/tex] is x = 6 or 7 which doesn't work so it works to a point.

The Bob (2004 ©)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K