View Full Version : Another try at a difficult proof
sebasalekhine7
Feb14-05, 08:36 PM
I found something very strange working with Riemann sums and expansion series.
Can anyone tell me why
\frac{x^n}{\sum_{i=1}^n x^{n-i}}=\frac{(x-1)x^n}{x^n-1}
Excuse the profanity, but I thought in the beginning this was a disgusting joke! :rofl: :yuck: :confused:
dextercioby
Feb14-05, 08:42 PM
Define a new variable of summation
j=:n-i
Transform the sum \sum_{i=1}^{n} x^{n-i} into a sum over "j" and the result will come out immediately.
Daniel.
P.S.What profanity?:confused:
sebasalekhine7
Feb14-05, 09:05 PM
Sorry, but I don't quite understand how to do what you just wrote.
learningphysics
Feb14-05, 09:13 PM
Sorry, but I don't quite understand how to do what you just wrote.
The way I did, just multiply the numerator and denominator by x-1. So in the denominator you get 2 summations (one minus the other). Simplify the denominator.
dextercioby
Feb14-05, 09:17 PM
It doesn't make any sense to me.
j=:n-i (1)
i=1 \Rightarrow j=n-1 (2)
i=n \Rightarrow j=0 (3)
The new sum (over "j") becomes
\sum_{j=n-1}^{j=0} x^{j}=\sum_{j=0}^{j=n-1} x^{j}=\frac{x^{n}-1}{x-1} (4)
Now plug it in the initial expression and u'll find the desired result...
Daniel.
learningphysics
Feb14-05, 09:54 PM
If you multiply the denominator through by x-1 you get:
\sum_{i=1}^{n} x^{n-i+1} - \sum_{i=1}^{n}x^{n-i}
You can simplify the above (try to make the two sums look the same) and get x^n-1
dextercioby
Feb14-05, 10:14 PM
How do you make that simplification...?
Daniel.
learningphysics
Feb14-05, 10:37 PM
How do you make that simplification...?
Daniel.
Similar to your method:
\sum_{i=1}^{n} x^{n-i+1} - \sum_{i=1}^{n}x^{n-i} =
\sum_{i=1}^{n} x^{n-(i-1)} - \sum_{i=1}^{n}x^{n-i}=
For the first sum, let j=i-1
\sum_{j=0}^{n-1} x^{n-j} - \sum_{i=1}^{n}x^{n-i} =
(x^{n-0} + \sum_{j=1}^{n-1} x^{n-j}) - (\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}x^{n-i} + x^{n-n}) =
I take out the first term from the first sum and last term from the second sum.
The two sums that are left cancel each other out.
x^n-1
dextercioby
Feb14-05, 10:44 PM
Wow,that's so simple!*admirative*...Gosh,why didn't i think of that...?*envy*
Daniel.
P.S.We should let the OP decide which solution he likes best.
sebasalekhine7
Feb14-05, 10:59 PM
I think they are both equally creative, well, thanks a lot for your help.
learningphysics
Feb15-05, 12:15 AM
Wow,that's so simple!*admirative*...Gosh,why didn't i think of that...?*envy*
Daniel.
P.S.We should let the OP decide which solution he likes best.
:smile: well, yours is the faster solution.
Curious3141
Feb15-05, 11:22 AM
Why can't one just use the sum for Geometric series ?
The denominator is x^{n-1} + x^{n-2} + ... + x^0 = \frac{x^n - 1}{x - 1}
using the well worn sum for GPs, and the answer immediately follows.
Galileo
Feb15-05, 02:04 PM
Why can't one just use the sum for Geometric series ?
The denominator is x^{n-1} + x^{n-2} + ... + x^0 = \frac{x^n - 1}{x - 1}
using the well worn sum for GPs, and the answer immediately follows.
Indeed, you can just cancel the x^n on both sides. Invert to get:
\frac{x^n-1}{x-1}=\sum_{i=1}^n x^{n-i}}
A well known fact.
PS: \sum_{i=1}^n x^{n-i}=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x^{i}
vBulletin® v3.7.6, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.