Understanding Geosynchronous Orbits for Communication Satellites

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jaypee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the requirements and characteristics of geosynchronous orbits for communication satellites, exploring the implications of orbital periods and the necessity of such orbits for effective communication. The scope includes theoretical considerations and practical applications related to satellite positioning and broadcasting.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that communications satellites must be in geosynchronous orbits to maintain a fixed position relative to the Earth’s surface.
  • One participant suggests that the orbital period of a geosynchronous satellite is 24 hours relative to the Sun, while noting a different period relative to the cosmic background.
  • Another participant challenges the necessity of geosynchronous orbits, proposing that multiple satellites could cover the same area without being in such orbits.
  • It is noted that while geosynchronous orbits are primarily used for TV broadcasting due to cost constraints, there are alternative systems that do not require such orbits.
  • Concerns are raised about the expense and technical challenges of launching satellites into geosynchronous orbit, particularly regarding the tracking capabilities of satellite dishes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of geosynchronous orbits for communication satellites, with some asserting their importance while others argue for alternative approaches. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal strategies for satellite deployment.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully addressed the assumptions underlying their claims, such as the specific requirements for different types of communication systems or the technical feasibility of alternatives to geosynchronous orbits.

jaypee
Communications satellites must be in geosynchronous orbits. That is, they must remain above a fixed point on Earth’s surface, enabling sending and receiving antennas to be aimed at a fixed point overhead. What, then, must be a communication satellite’s orbital period (the time for one complete orbit around Earth)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like a textbook problem. My guess is that, relative to the Earth, the orbital period is infinite, relative to the Sun, 24 hours, and relative to the cosmic background, 23 hours 56 minutes 4.09 seconds.
 
Booda is correct and that should be self evident. Clarification though - comms satellites do NOT necessarily need to be in geo orbit. If you have enough of them you can ensure one is overhead at all times.
 
Yes, communication satelites can broadcast over wide areas, so not all systems need to be in a geo-sync orbit, the main systems that use geo-sync are TV, because they can't afford 20 satellites to cover all the Earth at once, that is why you always point your dish towards the equator.
 
the main systems that use geo-sync are TV, because they can't afford 20 satellites to cover all the Earth at once, that is why you always point your dish towards the equator.
Actually given the expense of launching a satellite into geo orbit, I believe the reason they do it with tv satellites is the difficulty in having every dish actively track satellites.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
8K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K