Effective resistance of truncated conical cylinder

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the effective resistance of a truncated conical cylinder made of graphite, with specific dimensions and resistivity. The original poster is seeking guidance on how to set up the integration required to find the resistance between the top and bottom of the cylinder.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss treating the cylinder as a series of resistive disks and integrating to find the total resistance. Questions arise regarding the relationship between the radius and height during integration, and how to express the radius as a function of height.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations of how to approach the integration, with some participants suggesting linear relationships between radius and height. Guidance has been offered regarding the setup of the integration, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct expression for resistance.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem constraints include avoiding the need to solve Laplace's equation and ensuring that the integration accounts for the geometry of the truncated cone. There is also mention of a potential misunderstanding regarding the dependence of radius on height.

meteorologist1
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm having trouble doing this problem:
A truncated conical cylinder of graphite (bulk resistivity [tex]\rho = 1/\sigma[/tex]). The top of the cylinder has radius r = a, the bottom has r = b (b>a). Find the effective resistance between top and bottom of the cylinder. Show that the expression reduces to the usual one ([tex]R = \rho L / A[/tex]) when a = b.

I know I need to do some kind of integration from a to b, but I really don't know how to set this up. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just treat all the tiny cross sections as a bunch of resistors in series. That is, get the resistance for each one in terms of p, r (which goes from a to b), and dy, and integrate over y.
 
Last edited:
The professor said we shouldn't need to solve Laplace's equation for this problem. I'm thinking the effective resistance is the sum of resistive disks in series. And the integration would be integrating the height from 0 to L.

But first of all, the potential at a point z in between 0 and L would be just V(z) = (Vo/L)z, and therefore E = -Vo/L in the z-direction.

About the integration, do I have to both integrate the radius from a to b AND the height from 0 to L. Or should there be some kind of relationship between the radius and height (radius as a function of height)?
 
Ok, by doing sum of resistive disks, I got to this point:
[tex]dR = \frac{\rho dz}{\pi r^2}[/tex]
where r is the radius of a disk at height dz. The problem now is how to relate r and z because I'm pretty sure there's a dependence between radius and height. thanks.
 
yea sorry about that, I realized there was a much easier way.

Well r goes from a to b linearly as h goes from 0 to L, that's just the equation for a line. r = (b-a) h/L
 
It's still not working out. r = b - (b-a)z/L, but I could not get the right resistance expression when a = b. There must be something wrong with this r expression.
 
Nevermind. I made a mistake in the integration. It came out to be this:
[tex]R = \frac{\rho L}{\pi ab}[/tex]

Thanks.
 
What is z?

If you measure h from top,

[tex]r = a + \frac{h(b-a)}{L}[/tex]
 
His "z" is nearly the same as your "h", except he's measuring from the other end.
 

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K