What is the rotational kinetic energy of a clock's hour and minute hands?

  • Thread starter Thread starter UrbanXrisis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clock Rotation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the rotational kinetic energy of a clock's hour and minute hands, which have specified lengths and masses. Participants are exploring the formulas and concepts related to angular velocity and moment of inertia in the context of rotational motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to calculate angular velocities and rotational kinetic energy using different periods for the clock hands. There are discussions about the correct formulas for angular velocity and moment of inertia, with some questioning the assumptions made regarding the model of the clock hands.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various calculations and corrections regarding the periods used for the hour and minute hands. Some participants express agreement on the calculations, while others challenge the assumptions about the moment of inertia and the resulting formulas for kinetic energy.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the definitions of angular velocity and the moment of inertia for different shapes, with participants debating the appropriateness of using a thin rod model for the clock hands. The discussion reflects a mix of correct and incorrect assumptions about the physics involved.

UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
The hour hand and the minute hand of a clock are 2.7m long and 4.5m long and have masses of 60kg and 100kg respectively. Calculate the total rotational kinetic energy of the two hands about the axis of rotation.

[tex]w=circumfrence/time=2rpi/t=2(2.7m)pi/86400s[/tex]
[tex]w=1.96x10^{-4}rad/s[/tex]
[tex]w=circumfrence/time=2rpi/t=2(4.5m)pi/3600s[/tex]
[tex]w=0.00785rad/s[/tex]
[tex]energy=[m_1r_1^2w_1^2]+[m_2r_2^2w_2^2][/tex]
[tex]energy=[60kg*(2.7m)^2*(1.96x10^{-4}rad/s)^2]+[100kg*(4.5m)^2*(0.00785rad/s)^2][/tex]
[tex]energy=0.1248J[/tex]

is this the total energy of the two hands?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, your angular velocity [tex]\omega[/tex] is a measure of radians per second. This means that it is independent of the radius. So your forumula for each angular velocity should be [tex]\omega=2\pi/T[/tex].

Also, the rotational inertia of a thin rod rotating about an axis through one end and perpendicular to length (IIRC) should be [tex]I=1/3MR^2[/tex].

I think that's about right, check it out and tell me if you see any mistakes. :)
 
[tex]w=2pi/t=2pi/86400s[/tex]
[tex]w=7.27x10^{-5}rad/s[/tex]
[tex]w=2pi/t=2pi/3600s[/tex]
[tex]w=0.001745rad/s[/tex]
[tex]energy=[(1/3)m_1r_1^2w_1^2]+[(1/3)m_2r_2^2w_2^2][/tex]
[tex]energy=[(1/3)*60kg*(2.7m)^2*(7.27x10^{-5}rad/s)^2]+[(1/3)*100kg*(4.5m)^2*(0.001745rad/s)^2][/tex]
[tex]energy=0.0020569J[/tex]

is this correct? and why is it so small?
 
Because you used the WRONG periods:the one for a (mean solar) DAY and an hour,instead of an hour and one minute,respectively.:-p

Daniel.
 
it takes 12 hrs for the hour hand to rotate 360 degrees...(43200s)
it takes 1 hr for the minute hand to rotate 360 degrees...(3600s)

[tex]w=2pi/t=2pi/43200s[/tex]
[tex]w=1.45x10^{-4}rad/s[/tex]
[tex]w=2pi/t=2pi/3600s[/tex]
[tex]w=0.001745rad/s[/tex]
[tex]energy=[(1/3)m_1r_1^2w_1^2]+[(1/3)m_2r_2^2w_2^2][/tex]
[tex]energy=[(1/3)*60kg*(2.7m)^2*(1.45x10^{-4}rad/s)^2]+[(1/3)*100kg*(4.5m)^2*(0.001745rad/s)^2][/tex]
[tex]energy=0.002058J[/tex]

is this correct?
 
UrbanXrisis said:
it takes 12 hrs for the hour hand to rotate 360 degrees...(43200s)
it takes 1 hr for the minute hand to rotate 360 degrees...(3600s)

[tex]w=2pi/t=2pi/43200s[/tex]
[tex]w=1.45x10^{-4}rad/s[/tex]
[tex]w=2pi/t=2pi/3600s[/tex]
[tex]w=0.001745rad/s[/tex]
[tex]energy=[(1/3)m_1r_1^2w_1^2]+[(1/3)m_2r_2^2w_2^2][/tex]
[tex]energy=[(1/3)*60kg*(2.7m)^2*(1.45x10^{-4}rad/s)^2]+[(1/3)*100kg*(4.5m)^2*(0.001745rad/s)^2][/tex]
[tex]energy=0.002058J[/tex]

is this correct?

UrbanXrisis, you are simplifying the clock hands as thin rods, right? Then where did you derive the formula for rotational KE: [tex]KE_{rot} = 1/3mr^2\omega^2[/tex]? If the moment of inertia for a thin rod is 1/12 then [tex]KE_{rot} = 1/24mr^2\omega^2[/tex].
 
Last edited:
dextercioby said:
Nope,the moment of inertia is [itex]I=\frac{1}{3}ml^{2}[/itex]...Don't believe me,see here:http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html Scroll down till u hit a link with moment of inertia...

Daniel.

P.S.I hope u see where your assumption went wrong... :rolleyes:
Aaaa, I see, then the coefficient is 1/2*1/3 = 1/6.
 
  • #10
No,it is [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex]

Daniel.
 
  • #11
Are you kidding dude? I'm now talking about the rotational KE not about the moment of inertia. If [tex]I = 1/3mr^2[/tex], then
[tex]KE_{rot} = 1/2I\omega^2 = 1/2(1/3mr^2)\omega^2 = 1/6mr^2\omega^2[/tex], and not the result from UrbanXrisis:
[tex]KE_{rot} = 1/3mr^2\omega^2[/tex]
 
  • #12
Yes,then i agree...Didn't figure out what u meant.


Daniel.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
19K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K