Deriving Formulae for Cone, Pyramid and Sphere

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Formulae
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical derivation of volume formulas for a cone, pyramid, and sphere. The volume of a cone and pyramid is expressed as V_{cone} = V_{pyramid} = A_bh/3, where A_b is the base area, and the factor of 3 arises from integration techniques. The volume of a sphere is given by V_{sphere} = 4πr^3/3, derived using spherical coordinates and the Jacobian transformation. The discussion clarifies that the factor of 4π relates to the concept of steradians, not radians.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically integration techniques.
  • Familiarity with geometric concepts of cones, pyramids, and spheres.
  • Knowledge of polar and spherical coordinates.
  • Basic understanding of the Jacobian transformation in multivariable calculus.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of volume formulas using integration techniques in calculus.
  • Learn about the Jacobian transformation and its applications in multivariable calculus.
  • Explore the concept of steradians and their significance in three-dimensional geometry.
  • Investigate geometric properties of solids of revolution and their volume calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, educators teaching geometry and calculus, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of volume calculations for three-dimensional shapes.

DB
Messages
501
Reaction score
0
I'm just a little curious with these formulas because I like to understand a formula before I use it. There's no doubt I've been using these since gr3 but I would like a mathmatical derivation of them.

[tex]V_{cone}=\frac{A_bh}{3}[/tex]
[tex]V_{pyramid}=\frac{A_bh}{3}[/tex]
All I would like to know here is why by 3?

And just
[tex]V_{sphere}=\frac{4\pi r^3}{3}[/tex]
With this one I have no clue why it is what it is. There are [itex]4\pi[/itex]radians in a sphere maybe??

Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hm do you mean where does 3 come from?
in integration (calculus), we can find the formula by integration.
for ball, find antiderivative of p f(x)^2 dx
 
Well, a cone of height [tex]h[/tex] and with base radius [tex]\alpha h[/tex] can defined by [tex]T = \{ (x,\ y,\ z) \ | \ (\alpha z)^2 \geq x^2 + y^2,\; 0\leq z \leq h \}[/tex]. Clearly it is a solid of revolution (it is symmetric about the z-axis). Its volume is

[tex]V_{\mbox{cone}} = \int \int \int_T dV = \int_0^h \int_{-\alpha z}^{\alpha z} \int_{-\sqrt{(\alpha z)^2 - x^2}}^{\sqrt{(\alpha z)^2 - x^2}} \ dy \ dx\ dz = 2 \int_0^h \int_{-\alpha z}^{\alpha z} \sqrt{(\alpha z)^2 - x^2} \ dx \ dz = 2\int_0^h {(\alpha z)^2 \pi \over 2} \ dz = \alpha^2 \pi \left[{z^3\over 3}\right]_0^h = {\alpha^2 \pi h^3 \over 3}[/tex]

From here all you need to notice is that the base area is [tex]A_b = \alpha^2 h^2 \pi \Longrightarrow V_{\mbox{cone}} = {\alpha^2 \pi h^3 \over 3} = {A_b h \over 3}[/tex] as we wanted. Note that the third-to-last step is valid:

[tex]\int_{-a}^a \sqrt{a^2-x^2} dx = \int_{-{\pi \over 2}}^{\pi \over 2} a^2 \cos^2{t} \ dt = a^2\int_{-{\pi \over 2}}^{\pi \over 2} {1\over 2}\left[1+\cos{2t}\right] \ dt = {a^2 \over 2}\left[t + {\sin{2t} \over 2}\right]_ {-{\pi \over 2}}^{\pi \over 2} = {a^2 \pi \over 2}[/tex]


This is, incidentally, the area of a semicircle of radius [tex]a[/tex], which is to be expected since [tex]0 \leq y \leq \sqrt{a^2-x^2}, -a \leq x \leq a[/tex] defines such a semicircle!

The pyramid can be done in a similar manner, or by appealing to its geometry. You can try it :)

The volume of a sphere is also found in the same way, although this one's easier because you can just use spherical coordinates (who would have guessed!). A sphere of radius [tex]r[/tex] can be defined in polar coordinates to be just [tex]S = \{ ( \rho, \ \phi, \ \theta ) \ | 0 \leq \rho \leq r, \ 0 \leq \phi \leq \pi, \ 0 \leq \theta < 2\pi \}[/tex]. Using the Jacobian transformation we find that since our coordinate transformation is [tex]x = \rho \sin{\phi} \cos{\theta}, \ y = \rho \sin{\phi} \sin{\theta}, z = \rho \cos{\phi}[/tex] we get [tex]dV = \rho^2 \sin{\phi} \ d\rho \ d\phi \ d\theta[/tex] and so our volume is

[tex]V_{\mbox{sphere}} = \int \int \int_S dV = \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^\pi \int_0^r \rho^2 \sin{\phi} \ d\rho \ d\phi \ d\theta = 2\pi \int_0^\pi \sin{\phi} \ d\phi \int_0^r \rho^2 \ d\rho = 2\pi\left[-\cos{\theta}\right]_0^\pi\left[{\rho^3\over 3}\right]_0^r = (2\pi)(2){r^3 \over 3} = {4 \pi r^3 \over 3}[/tex]

again as we wanted. As to your question about [tex]4\pi[/tex] radians in a sphere: not quite, but very close. There are [tex]4\pi[/tex] of what we call steradians in a sphere. These are a "unit" (and I use the term loosely, because neither radians nor steradians are really a unit) for a sort of two-dimensional angular arc.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 171 ·
6
Replies
171
Views
13K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K