What is the Force Required to Keep a Block from Slipping Down a Wall in Physics?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block of wood being pushed against a wall, requiring the calculation of the force necessary to prevent it from slipping down due to gravity. The context includes concepts of friction, normal force, and equilibrium in a physics scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between gravitational force and frictional force, questioning whether they can assume these forces are equal in magnitude. There is also exploration of the role of normal force in this context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants clarifying concepts related to forces and equilibrium. Some guidance has been provided regarding the relationship between forces, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach to solving the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of certain instructional methods, such as the use of negative signs in force direction, which has led to some confusion. There is also mention of ignoring friction between the hand and the block, which may affect the analysis.

Nx2
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
ok, so i got this assignment for the march break and our teacher hit us with this weird question.

You are pushing horizontally on a 3.0kg block of wood, pressing it against the wall. if the coefficient of friction between the block and the wall is μ = 0.60, how much force must you exert on the block to keep it from slipping down the wall?

so, i came to the conclusion that Fg = 29.4N, I am guessing Ff would be opposite to it, but i don't know if it will equal Fg. Also i think that the normal force will be oppsite to the applied force in this question, no? The thing is, i don't know how to solve for any of these values. would i assume that Ff equals Fg then use Ff = μ * FN and solve for FN? would that work?... i don't know...
... Any help would be very much appreciated. Thanks.

- Tu
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nx2 said:
would i assume that Ff equals Fg then use Ff = μ * FN and solve for FN? would that work?...
That is the solution. But you wouldn't 'assume' Fg = -μ * FN. You know that from Newton's laws of motion since the block does not accelerate: Fg + μFN = ma = 0

AM
 
im sorry, I am kinda confused... so i would use Fg = -μ * FN?... i don't understand where the negetive came from.

- Tu
 
Andrew Mason did not mean that you can't use it- his point was the you shouldn't say "assume" for something that MUST be true- if the block doesn't move then there must be no net force. There IS force Fg= -mg (the negative means downward) due to gravity so there must be a force upward of +mg. The only possible upward force is the friction force which is μ*FN: μ*FN= mg= -Fg. The reason for the negative on -Fg is because the two forces oppose: Fg is downward so μ*FN must be upward. If you are worried about the fact that μ*FN is upward, note that "negative times negative is positive" and Fg is itself negative.
 
ooo... ic... sorry bout that... my teacher never uses negetives, he never told us anythiing bout it... but i read in the textbook that negetive means negetive direction. don't know why he doesn't use it. he always says don't worry about it... well anyways, thanks a lot.

- Tu
 
A few comments about this problem:
(1) As Andrew points out, you know the block is in equilibrium so: [itex]mg + F_f = 0[/itex]. The weight and friction force point in opposite directions.
(2) The maximum value of static friction force (for a given normal force) is given by [itex]F_f = \mu N[/itex]. Although the problem didn't state it, you are supposed to find the least amount of normal force (N) needed to hold the block up. (You are always welcome to push harder!)
(3) You are probably expected to ignore the friction between your hand and the block.
 
thanks for all the input guys... i appreciate it. makes everything so much clearer.

- Tu
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
13K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K