sequence of rationals that converge to irrational

[tonebone10]

Find a sequence of rational numbers that converges to the square root of 2

[mathwonk]

use newton's binomial theorem? i.e. (1+1)^(1/2) = 1 + (1/2) + (1/2)(-1/2)(1/2) +

+ (1/2)(-1/2)(-3/2)(1/2)(1/3)+......

this might work.

[Data]

Or another of Newton's tricks:

How do I approximate the positive root of x^2-2?

x_1 = 1

x_2 = x_1 - \frac{x_1^2 - 2}{2x_1}

. \ . \ .

x_n = x_{n-1} - \frac{x_{n-1}^2 - 2}{2x_{n-1}}

. \ . \ .

Obviously each term is rational and \{x_n\} converges to \sqrt{2}.

[Data]

And converges quite quickly, I might add.

[HallsofIvy]

Do you mean giving a general formula?

If not, take the square root of 2 on a calculator:
1.4142135623730950488016887242097

So a sequence of rationals converging to square root of 2 is:
1, 1.4, 1.41, 1.414, 1.4142, 1.41421, 1.414213, 1.4142135, 1.41421356, etc.

[mathwonk]

the problem here is that a calculator has a bounded number of terms.

[shmoe]

You could take the sequence of convergents of the continued fraction of sqrt(2).

\sqrt{2}=1+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2+\ldots }}}

[Jameson]

I think Data's use of Newton's Method is the best way to display the sequence that converges. Shmoe's definition of the square root of two is correct, but it isn't really written in a form that converges, although I'm sure shmoe could easily do that. I think good old Newton can help you best.

[shmoe]

Shmoe's definition of the square root of two is correct, but it isn't really written in a form that converges...

I'm not sure what you mean here. The notation I used is pretty standard, and the sequence of convergents does converge to \sqrt{2}.

Maybe I should have defined what I meant by the convergents. I just mean the sequence begining

1,1+\frac{1}{2}, 1+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2}}, 1+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2}}},\ldots

Or do you want some proof that this continued fraction is actually \sqrt{2}?

\sqrt{2}=1+(\sqrt{2}-1)=1+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{2}}

Then repeat:

\sqrt{2}=1+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{2}}}=1+\fra c{1}{2+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{2}}}},\ldots

In this way you can easily see \sqrt{2} is larger than all the even convergents and smaller than all the odd convergents (calling the first term the 0th). If you believe that they convegre to something (this is pretty standard) then that something has to be \sqrt{2}

[Jameson]

I didn't see the "..." you had included. I just wanted to make sure it was understood that the sequence had to keep going in order to converge. It sounded worse than I meant it. I just liked the way Data wrote the convergence of Newton's Method, with "nth" notation. You are of course very correct with all you said... didn't mean to imply otherwise.

[shmoe]

Oh I see :smile: The ... are quite small, I would have probably missed them if I didn't know I put it there.