Probability and Geometry

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter philosophking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry Probability
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around calculating the probability that a dart, hitting a square board at random, lands closer to the center than to the edge. Participants explore various mathematical approaches to this problem, including geometric reasoning and integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the problem, noting the different distances from the center to the edges and diagonals of the square.
  • Another participant suggests that the probability can be understood in terms of relative area and provides a mathematical expression involving parabolas to define the region closer to the center.
  • A third participant shares their own calculations, arriving at a probability of 3/4, which they later question as potentially incorrect.
  • Several participants report different probability values, with one suggesting a value of approximately 0.458 and another proposing around 0.219.
  • Another participant mentions using MATLAB for simulations, obtaining a probability close to their theoretical value.
  • Some participants discuss the integration methods used to find the area of the relevant regions, with differing opinions on whether a double integral is necessary.
  • One participant describes their approach to finding the locus of points equidistant from the center and the sides, emphasizing the symmetry of the problem.
  • Another participant challenges the necessity of a double integral, arguing that a single integral suffices for the area calculation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions and calculations regarding the probability, with no consensus reached on the correct value. Multiple competing views and methods are presented, indicating an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note various assumptions and methods, including the need to consider different quadrants and the specific equations of parabolas in each. Some calculations are acknowledged as potentially erroneous, and the discussion reflects a complex interplay of geometric and probabilistic reasoning.

philosophking
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
What is the probability that a dart, hitting a square board at random, lands nearer the center than the edge?

This was a problem at a past NJUMC test, and I'm not sure how to go about it. It's obviously not a circle, because the equal distance between the center and the edge horizontally and vertically is simply (side/4), while the equal distance between the center and the edge on the diagonals is (side)/(2sqrt(2)).

So I'm very confused and frustrated :-/

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a problem like that "probability" is relative area. The point (x,y) (x,y both positive) is "equi-distant" from center and edge if [itex]\sqrt{x^2+ y^2}= min(s-x,s-y)[/itex].
If, for example s-x is smaller than s-y, you get [itex]x^2+ y^2= x^2- 2sx+ s^2[/itex] or [itex]y^2= -2sx- s^2[/itex], a parabola. It looks to me like the area "nearer the center than the edge" is the region bounded by the parabolas [itex]y= \frac{1}{2}(s^2- x^2)[/itex], [itex]x= \frac{1}{2}(s^2- y^2)[/itex], [itex]y= -\frac{1}{2}(s^2-x^2)[/itex], and [itex]x= -\frac{1}{2}(s^2- y^2)[/itex].
 
Thank you ver much for your help, but I'm still having problems. How exactly would you evaluate what you have set up?

I took a similar approach to yours after reading your suggestions, and ended up getting 3/4. That doesn't sound right to me :)

Thank you again for your help. I was thinking of exactly what type of region would enclose this, and your saying parabola really helped me out.

::EDIT::

Haha! I may still be wrong, but I love going back after thinking I got a problem wrong, doing it over, and thinking I got it right this time. 29/66.

I'd still like to hear what you got :)
 
Last edited:
This was the most irritating problem I've done in a while because it's fairly tedious and for some reason, I kept slipping up in my calculations. I hope my current answer is correct. :

[tex]p = 8 - \frac{16}{3}\sqrt{2}[/tex], which is around 0.458

Definitely not a "neat" rational answer.
 
Quick, somebody throw darts at a square board a thousand times and confirm my answer experimentally. :biggrin:
 
Curious3141 said:
This was the most irritating problem I've done in a while because it's fairly tedious and for some reason, I kept slipping up in my calculations. I hope my current answer is correct. :

[tex]p = 8 - \frac{16}{3}\sqrt{2}[/tex], which is around 0.458

Definitely not a "neat" rational answer.

dont you think that is a little big?
 
Yeah, that's what I thought too. If you draw it out it looks like it should only be around 1/3 or so.
 
I get [tex]\frac{4\sqrt{2}-5}{3}\thickapprox .21895[/tex]
 
Zone Ranger said:
I get [tex]\frac{4\sqrt{2}-5}{3}\thickapprox .21895[/tex]

That looks much more correct. I must have made a mistake somewhere, because the answer should be bounded by :

[tex]3 - 2\sqrt{2} < p < \frac{1}{4}[/tex] and your answer certainly fits. I'll go back to the drawing board and see where I slipped up. It's almost certainly some stupid error.
 
  • #10
i used MATLAB to run 10,000 simulated dart throwings.
i got p=.2193. which is close to the theoretical value i got.
 

Attachments

  • prob.JPG
    prob.JPG
    23.1 KB · Views: 439
Last edited:
  • #11
Zone Ranger, your answer is exactly correct. I made a mistake in taking the wrong element of the area during the integration. Other than that, I think we have the same method. :smile:
 
  • #12
Could you please show how you did it? Thank you!
 
  • #13
look at the first quadrant. assume x<y then set [tex]\sqrt{x^2+y^2}=s-y[/tex]. solving for y we get
[tex]y=\frac{s^2-x^2}{2s}[/tex]

find out what x ranges over (find out when x=y). so take [tex]y=\frac{s^2-x^2}{2s}[/tex] and replace y by x to get
[tex]x=\frac{s^2-x^2}{2s}[/tex]. solve for x you get
[tex](\sqrt{2}-1)s[/tex] so then [tex]{\int_{x=0}^{(\sqrt{2}-1)s}}\frac{s^2-x^2}{2s}dx=(\frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3}-\frac{5}{6})s^2[/tex] now you have integrated too much so we subtract the triangle that is below the line y=x. ei subtract [tex]\frac{1}{2}[(\sqrt{2}-1)s]^2[/tex]

but this is only 1/8th of the picture so we multiply the above by 8 and divide by the total area of the square which is [tex]4s^2[/tex]. then you get the result i got above

ie

[tex]\frac{[(\frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3}-\frac{5}{6})s^2-\frac{1}{2}[(\sqrt{2}-1)s]^2]8}{4s^2}=\frac{4\sqrt{2}-5}{3}[/tex]
 
  • #14
What I did was to find the locus of points that were equidistant from the center and the sides. I used the diagonals to divide the square into 4 quadrants. The equation of the parabola in each quadrant is different, but we only have to consider one of the quadrants because of the symmetry.

Lower left hand corner = origin, side of square = 2A. Vertices are at (0,0);(2A,0);(0,2A) and (2A,2A). The bottom most quadrant is the one I considered. The equidistant parabola in the bottom quadrant is defined by :

[tex](x - A)^2 + (y - A)^2 = y^2[/tex]

Basically, solve for the minimum of that parabola (it's at [tex](A, \frac{A}{2})[/tex]) and the point at which the parabola intersects the diagonals of the square (those occur at [tex](2 - \sqrt{2}, 2 - \sqrt{2}) and (2 + \sqrt{2}, 2 - \sqrt{2})[/tex]. Then find the area of the parabola bounded by the lines [tex]y = \frac{A}{2}[/tex] and [tex]y = 2 - \sqrt{2}[/tex]. Add that to the area of the triangle in the bottom quadrant that is enclosed within the two diagonals and lies above that area. This area is given by [tex](\sqrt{2} - 1)^2 = 3 - 2\sqrt{2}[/tex]. Add the two areas together, and this is the area for one quadrant that is closer to the center than the sides.

You need to multiply by 4 and divide by the area of the square, which is [tex]4A^2[/tex]. That gives the answer.
 
  • #15
shouldnt it be a double integral..
 
  • #16
cronxeh said:
shouldnt it be a double integral..

No. Zone Ranger and I had similar methods, but I'll quote mine because I'm familiar with it.

The element of area I integrated (bounded by the y-bounds I stated) was :

[tex]2(x - A)dy[/tex]

and that gives :

[tex]2\int_{\frac{A}{2}}^{A(2 - \sqrt{2})}(x - A)dy[/tex]

where [tex]x = A + \sqrt{(A)(2y - A)}[/tex]

Then that area needs to be added to the area of the triangle above it in the bottom quadrant, then multiplied by 4 and divided by [tex]4A^2[/tex].
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Well I thought if you have average dart-hit density on that surface, then you would go about calculating the average distance of each hit from origin circle to that point using a double integral..
 
  • #18
cronxeh said:
Well I thought if you have average dart-hit density on that surface, then you would go about calculating the average distance of each hit from origin circle to that point using a double integral..

But that's not what we're doing. We're finding the locus of points that are equidistant from the center and from one of the sides. There is a different parabola in each quadrant (as divided up by the diagonals), and these parabolas together constitute the locus. The required probability is the ratio of the area enclosed by the locus and the total area of the dartboard.

To find the area enclosed by the locus in one quadrant you only need a single integral.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K