How Do You Calculate the Masses of Fragments from a Decaying Particle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the masses of fragments resulting from the decay of an unstable particle with an initial mass of 3.34 x 10^-27 kg. Participants emphasize the importance of conserving both energy and momentum in the calculations. The correct approach involves converting the mass to eV/c², setting up equations for momentum (m1v1 = m2v2) and energy (E1 + E2 = m1c² + m2c²), and solving the resulting system of equations. The approximate masses derived from the calculations are m1 at 140 MeV/c² and m2 at 500 MeV/c².

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic physics concepts, including energy and momentum conservation
  • Familiarity with mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²)
  • Ability to convert mass units to energy units (eV/c²)
  • Basic algebra skills for solving systems of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about relativistic momentum and energy conservation principles
  • Study the conversion of mass to energy units in particle physics
  • Explore examples of decay processes in particle physics
  • Practice solving systems of equations in physics contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on particle physics and decay processes, as well as educators teaching concepts of energy and momentum conservation.

Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
So the problem is

An unstable particle with a mass of 3.34 x 10^-27kg is initially at rest. The particle decays into two fragments that fly off along the x-axis with velocity components 0.987c and -0.868c. Find the amsses of the fragmments. (Suggestion: Conserve both energy and momentum).

So i setup ymv = ymv (for the second)
I figured out both y's
I then used E=mc^2 to find the rest energy and got like, 3.0x10^-10
I divided that in half and then used (y-1)mc^2 (At this point in the post i realized what i did wrong i hope lol)
to figure out what mass would give 1.5x10^-10

That would give me each mass... am i correct?
Im re-doing my steps as we spoke so i hope I am right :D

*Edit*

Ok so i did still do it wrong... i still need help :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am a little confused by your description of the set up.
You would be good to follow the following method:
1) convert 3.34X10^-27 kg to eV/c^2
2) use you energy relation to solve for one of the two masses(since they must be different to conserve momentum for linear trajectories to one another)
3) solve for your momentum. gamma1*m1*v1=(-1)*gamma2*m2*v2(since one velocity is along the neg x and the other along the positive x)
4) now you should have two equations with two unknowns, so it is ready to be solved.

By my calc(with some round off) you should get m1(v=.987c) approx.=140 MeV/c^2
and m2 approx. = 500 MeV/c^2

Like I said these are not exact but close. You can always check if iyour solution is right with the energy or momentum conservation.
 


Hi there,

Based on the information provided, it seems like you are on the right track! However, there are a few things that need to be corrected in your approach.

Firstly, when setting up the conservation of momentum equation, it should be written as:

m1v1 = m2v2

Where m1 and v1 represent the mass and velocity of one fragment, and m2 and v2 represent the mass and velocity of the other fragment.

Secondly, when using the conservation of energy equation, it should be written as:

E1 + E2 = (m1c^2) + (m2c^2)

Where E1 and E2 represent the initial energy of the unstable particle and (m1c^2) and (m2c^2) represent the rest energies of the two fragments.

Thirdly, when solving for the masses, you will need to set up a system of equations using the two equations above and solve for m1 and m2.

So, to answer your question, your approach is correct but there are some minor errors that need to be corrected. Keep up the good work and don't hesitate to ask for help if you need it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K