Displacement Calculation: Speed x Time

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PrudensOptimus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Speed
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of displacement in physics, specifically whether it can be accurately determined by the product of speed and time. Participants explore various mathematical approaches to displacement, including integrals and discrete integration methods, while addressing the nuances of these calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if exact displacement can be calculated as the sum of speed multiplied by time.
  • Another participant asserts that exact displacement is represented by the area under a velocity curve, suggesting the use of integrals.
  • A participant clarifies that displacement is not simply a sum but an integral of velocity over time.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of integrals as limits of sums, with some participants emphasizing the importance of small time intervals.
  • Participants propose using discrete integration methods, such as rectangles and trapezoids, to estimate the area under the curve for given speed and time intervals.
  • One participant describes Simpson's method as a way to interpolate points with a parabola for integration, providing a more accurate estimation than basic methods.
  • Another participant suggests that if speeds are constant over intervals, a sum of the products of speed and time for those intervals can yield the exact displacement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the method of calculating displacement, with some advocating for integrals while others support discrete summation approaches. There is no consensus on a single method being superior or universally applicable.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the importance of time intervals being very small and the implications of using different integration methods, but do not resolve the mathematical steps or assumptions involved in these calculations.

PrudensOptimus
Messages
641
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Is the exact displacement = sum of ( speed * time ) ?

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Exact displacement is the area between a velocity curve and the x-axis.
 
It's not a sum,but an integral...

[tex]\int d\vec{r} =\int \vec{v} \ dt[/tex]

Choose two moments of time [itex]t_{1} < t_{2}[/itex] and u'll find

[tex]\vec{r}\left(t_{2}\right)-\vec{r}\left(t_{1}\right) =\int_{t_{1}}^{t_{2}} \vec{v} \ dt[/tex]

Daniel.
 
integral is sum...
 
No.The integral is a limit of a Riemann/Darboux/... sum...

Daniel.
 
i forgot to mention that the time is very very very small... it is in measured in miliseconds
 
The process of taking a limit is independent of the unit chosen for a physical quantity...

Daniel.
 
so how do I make a good estimation of the area under the curve given the speed and time in miliseconds?
 
By evaluating that integral...Formulate the problem with its original text.Then we'll see what it needs to be done.

Daniel.
 
  • #10
Just try to apply a basic discrete integration scheme, like rectangles :

[tex]d=\sum_{i=1}^n v_i*\Delta t_i[/tex]

I suppose in your case, the intervals [tex]\Delta t_i[/tex] are all the same.
You can also use trapezoidal scheme.

But you can apply better integration scheme, like Simpson (2n order interpolation), or even higher splines stuff, aso...
 
  • #11
what is the Simpson's method?
 
  • #12
I think in the Simpson method you interpolate 3 points with a parabola and integrate the obtained curve. This is equivalent to the ponderation : 2/3*rectangle+1/3*trapezes and gives :

[tex]d=\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}(v(t_{i+1})+4v(\frac{t_i+t_{i+1}}{2})+v(t_{i})) \frac{\Delta t_i}{6}[/tex]

It's of double order than rectangles...
 
  • #13
The easiest way is to find a fit to your curve, integrate that wrt time, and evaluate your endpoints. Best estimation you could get.
 
  • #14
If you are given intervals in time and speeds that remain constant (piecewise, presumably) over those intervals, then taking a sum over all the intervals of the time on the interval times the speed on the interval will give you the exact displacement, yes.
 
  • #15
Data said:
If you are given intervals in time and speeds that remain constant (piecewise, presumably) over those intervals, then taking a sum over all the intervals of the time on the interval times the speed on the interval will give you the exact displacement, yes.


Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
7K