Friction: Does Contact Area Affect Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter student85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between contact area and frictional force, specifically questioning whether a larger contact area affects the force of friction experienced by objects of equal weight. The subject area is friction in physics, particularly focusing on the formula F=uN, where the frictional force is related to the normal force and the coefficient of friction.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of contact area on friction, with one participant questioning why a larger area does not seem to correlate with increased friction. Others discuss the role of normal force and pressure in relation to contact area.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes differing viewpoints on the role of contact area in friction. Some participants provide insights into the relationship between pressure, area, and normal force, suggesting that while area may influence friction, it is ultimately the normal force that is more critical in determining frictional force.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference experimental observations regarding kinetic and static friction, indicating that assumptions about the relationship between area and friction may need to be reconsidered. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the topic, with no definitive consensus reached.

student85
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
The formula for the calculation of friction, F=uN, where u is the friction coeficient, doesn't include anything related with its area of contact.
That is, to what I know, a rectangle for example, weighing 3 kg that is real long and has little height, has a big area of contact with the surface it is on, compared to a block for example, of the same weight . I think that the rectangle is harder to move because of its much bigger area of contact.
I know that because it has a big area of contact then its weight is distributed and so it has less Newtons per cubic m.
However I still think that the rectangle should have a greater friction than the cube..am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are wrong, but at least you are thinking.

The larger area will be compensated for by a smaller density. Ultimately in kinetics we adopt the model of a point particle of mass 3kg, and measure the normal force on this. However, the normal force has no component on area simply because the area doesn't matter.

Think of something like a car. A car has a surface area of contact of maybe .5m^2 (tires), but if you got rid of the entire car and just had the 4 tires, it would be much easier to move. The surface area plays no role in this calculation.
 
student85 said:
The formula for the calculation of friction, F=uN, where u is the friction coeficient, doesn't include anything related with its area of contact.
That is, to what I know, a rectangle for example, weighing 3 kg that is real long and has little height, has a big area of contact with the surface it is on, compared to a block for example, of the same weight . I think that the rectangle is harder to move because of its much bigger area of contact.
I know that because it has a big area of contact then its weight is distributed and so it has less Newtons per cubic m.
However I still think that the rectangle should have a greater friction than the cube..am I right?
Experimentally it has been shown that the kinetic friction force and maximum static friction force are proportional to the normal pressure x area of contact. The pressure determines how strongly the two surfaces 'mesh'. The area determines the extent of contact of the two surfaces. But pressure x area = total Normal force.

So you are right in the sense that a larger surface with the same pressure will have the greater friction force. But in order to have the same pressure, normal force must increase in proportion to area. So in the end, it is easier to think of friction as simply proportional to normal force.

AM
 
Thanks guys
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K