Optimizing Audio Signals: Tips for Lagging and Synchronizing Electric Waves

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evgeny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Audio Signal
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around optimizing audio signals for an active noise-cancellation circuit, focusing on synchronizing sound waves with their corresponding electric signals. Participants explore both analog and digital approaches to achieve effective noise cancellation, addressing challenges faced by beginners in electronics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Evgeny seeks assistance in synchronizing sound waves with electric signals for an active noise-cancellation circuit, expressing challenges as a beginner in electronics.
  • Warren inquires whether Evgeny is using analog or digital circuitry.
  • Evgeny confirms he is using analog circuitry and is currently focused on grasping the basics of electronics.
  • Another participant suggests that digital circuitry might be easier to learn, highlighting the simplicity of binary states and the complexity of analog circuits.
  • This participant also discusses the importance of using a high-speed inverting op-amp for noise cancellation and mentions the limitations of analog circuits in prediction compared to digital methods.
  • A design idea for an active analog delay is shared, with a link to a schematic for further exploration.
  • Ray argues that the delays in analog circuits are minimal and suggests that converting the signal to digital for storage and later recall may be necessary for effective delay, mentioning the potential costs of sonic delay generators.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness and practicality of analog versus digital approaches for noise cancellation. There is no consensus on the best method, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal strategy for Evgeny's project.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the challenges of synchronizing audio signals, the complexity of analog circuits, and the potential advantages of digital methods, but do not resolve the technical details or assumptions underlying their suggestions.

Evgeny
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hello!
I'm building a circuit which requires a sound wave to catch up to an electric signal of the same wave generated by a microphone (after its gone through amplification, phase correction, etc of course). Can anyone please help me with this, or at least point me in the right direction?
Just if anyone is interested, what I'm trying to do is the classic active noise-cancellation circuit, where a sound wave is electrically inverted and superpositioned on top of the original sound wave - hence, cancelling anything out. While this sounds like a fairly simple circuit, I'm learning electronics from the ground up, and getting the output wave and the original wave in synch is proving to be a tough thing to do.
Thanks in advance,
-Evgeny
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Are you using analog or digital circuitry?

- Warren
 
Analog - like I said, I'm a complete beginner and am just trying to grasp the basics of electronics, so digital is a bit further than where I am right now in my studies.
 
Evgeny said:
Analog - like I said, I'm a complete beginner and am just trying to grasp the basics of electronics, so digital is a bit further than where I am right now in my studies.

Digital is actually much easier to learn. No dealing with finite levels and gains and the like. Digital boils down to one of two states(you'll see these states defined as on/off or 0/5 mostly but in reality you the designer can call these states anything you like--which is akin to programming languages use of the if statement). This is an over simplification to say the least but it should help you see what digital actually is. Finding the Q-point for a cascaded transistor amp can be a pain in the butt. Thinking in terms of simple numbers can be a little easier IMHO.

A high speed inverting opamp(you'll have to use at least one transistor as part of the gain loop to allow for cancellation and not just overpowering with a higher magnitude sound that is out of phase) could allow for a little bit of noise cancellation. The problem is--unless you are designing a full blown analog computer--analog circuits won't allow for prediction. Digital noise cancellation uses very complex prediction algorithms to improve in the cancellation quality.

Start simple: play around with basic transistor amps--common base, common emitter, and common collector. Learn how to set the Q-point and the characteristics of each amp configuration. Once you can do that (this is the easy part) redesign each amp as a switch. Once you can do that, design an H-Bridge. Make some A, AB, B, and C class amplifiers. This step will help you make your noise cancellation circuit. Once you know how to use basic transistors(go to Jameco or mouser or digi-key and buy metric butt ton of 2n2222A's and 2n2907A's) move on to op amps. There are millions of web sites out there detailing op amp usage as well as transistor circuit usage.

Once you've done the above, try and make some astables or monostables and/or oscillators.

Well, good luck in your endeavor.
 
Here's a design idea for an active analog delay:

http://www.elecdesign.com/Articles/ArticleID/6348/6348.html

See the schematic linked in as a figure.

- Warren
 
Last edited by a moderator:
only possible answer

Chroots suggestion is not for audio the delays are miniscule as are the delays of coax the problem with audio is the frequency is low even to create an echo is something in Milliseconds not micro or nano secs.
I am sorry to say the only practical way is to convert the signal to digital then store the words in a memory and recall them later if this is not your thing yet -- then you too will have to delay . There is only one thing slow enough and that is sound I believe but have not researched the subject that there are sonic delay generators --- but you will have to research this and it sounds expensive .
Ray.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K